Literature DB >> 17007163

Intention to register as organ donors: a survey of adolescents.

Daniel Baughn1, James R Rodrigue, Danielle L Cornell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about factors that influence the intention of adolescents to register as organ donors. The identification of such factors has important implications for the development and implementation of educational programs and subsequent donor registration rates.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether adolescents with an expressed commitment to becoming organ donor registrants differ significantly from nondonors on sociodemographic characteristics and factors influencing their decision. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred forty-five adolescents visiting a Department of Motor Vehicles office for a permit or license (n=153) or attending a driver's education course (n=292) completed a semistructured interview and questionnaire.
RESULTS: Female (52.6%) and white (55.8%) adolescents were more likely to have favorable donation intentions relative to male (45.6%) and nonwhite (39.0%) adolescents (chi2 = 7.5, P = .02, and chi2 = 19.7, P = .003, respectively). Those with favorable donation intentions also endorsed significantly more positive factors (benevolence, need awareness, existentialism) as being more important in their decision. Adolescents who did not want to donate (58.7%) and those who were undecided (23.1%) were less likely to have discussed their decision with parents than were those who wanted to donate (67.7%, chi2 = 63.6, P = .0001). Finally, providing adolescents with a free driver's license in exchange for organ donor registration would have the greatest impact on registering undecided adolescents (29.8%, chi2 = 33.2, P = .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a pressing need for more systematic and culturally sensitive organ donation education directed toward adolescents, and the Department of Motor Vehicles and driver's education courses may be appropriate venues. An educational program from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Decision: Donation, could be used in this context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17007163     DOI: 10.1177/152692480601600313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Transplant        ISSN: 1526-9248            Impact factor:   1.065


  9 in total

1.  Understanding selective refusal of eye donation. Identity, beauty, and interpersonal relationships.

Authors:  Mitchell Lawlor; Ian Kerridge
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 1.352

2.  Effects of classroom education on knowledge and attitudes regarding organ donation in ethnically diverse urban high schools.

Authors:  Vicky Cárdenas; John D Thornton; Kristine A Wong; Clarence Spigner; Margaret D Allen
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.863

3.  A Standardized Donor Designation Ratio to Assess the Performance of Driver's License Agencies.

Authors:  N K R Sehgal; C Sullivan; M Figueroa; J A Pencak; D Einstadter; J D Thornton
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2017 Jul - Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  The combination of an online organ and tissue registry with a public education campaign can increase the number of organs available for transplantation.

Authors:  Ali Salim; Darren Malinoski; Danielle Schulman; Chirag Desai; Sonia Navarro; Eric J Ley
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2010-08

5.  Is Signature Size Associated With Organ Donor Designation on Driver's Licenses?

Authors:  N K R Sehgal; C Sullivan; C Scallan; M Figueroa; J A Pencak; J Kirkland; K Scott; J D Thornton
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

6.  Stability of Organ Donor Designations on Driver's Licenses.

Authors:  N K R Sehgal; C Sullivan; M Figueroa; J A Pencak; J D Thornton
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.066

7.  The Relationship Between Verified Organ Donor Designation and Patient Demographic and Medical Characteristics.

Authors:  N K R Sehgal; C Scallan; C Sullivan; M Cedeño; J Pencak; J Kirkland; K Scott; J D Thornton
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Factors encouraging and inhibiting organ donation in Israel: the public view and the contribution of legislation and public policy.

Authors:  Daniel Sperling; Gabriel M Gurman
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 1.352

9.  Family discussions and demographic factors influence adolescent's knowledge and attitude towards organ donation after brain death: a questionnaire study.

Authors:  Vanessa Stadlbauer; Christoph Zink; Paul Likar; Michael Zink
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 2.652

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.