Literature DB >> 17005487

Telephone use: what benefit do cochlear implant users receive?

Ilona Anderson1, Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner, Klaus Böheim, Alexander Nahler, Christoph Arnoldner, Christoph Arnolder, Patrick D'Haese.   

Abstract

This study evaluated the use of landline and mobile phones in an international sample of cochlear implant users. A custom-designed survey was mailed to cochlear implant users from four different countries. A link to the survey was posted on the MED-EL website, with responses from a further six countries. Results from 196 surveys show that there is a significant shift from pre-operative non-use of a telephone to use of a telephone post-operatively. Seventy-one percent of MED-EL cochlear implant users are able to use a landline telephone to some extent and 54% are able to use a mobile phone to some extent. Talking to familiar speakers about familiar topics is the easiest listening condition on the telephone, and it is easier to recognize a voice using the landline. Many respondents found it difficult to make a call without some assistance. Most respondents could manage to call someone in an emergency, even on a mobile phone. Data obtained should provide useful information in the counselling and rehabilitation of cochlear implant recipients and candidates.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17005487     DOI: 10.1080/14992020600690969

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  8 in total

1.  Quality of life and audiologic performance through the ability to phone of cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Cécile Rumeau; Julien Frère; Bettina Montaut-Verient; Alexis Lion; Gérome Gauchard; Cécile Parietti-Winkler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Evaluation of wireless Bluetooth devices to improve recognition of speech and sentences when using a mobile phone in bone conduction device recipients.

Authors:  Tae Hoon Kong; Chanbeom Kwak; Woojae Han; Young Joon Seo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Fine structure processing improves telephone speech perception in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Javier Galindo; Luis Lassaletta; Rosa Pérez Mora; Alejandro Castro; Marta Bastarrica; Javier Gavilán
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Troubleshooting Cochlear Implant Processors via Tele-Audiology.

Authors:  Benjamin Boss
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2021-08-02

5.  PLLA Coating of Active Implants for Dual Drug Release.

Authors:  Katharina Wulf; Madeleine Goblet; Stefan Raggl; Michael Teske; Thomas Eickner; Thomas Lenarz; Niels Grabow; Gerrit Paasche
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Using the HISQUI29 to assess the sound quality levels of Spanish adults with unilateral cochlear implants and no contralateral hearing.

Authors:  Miryam Calvino; Javier Gavilán; Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado; Rosa M Pérez-Mora; Elena Muñoz; Jesús Díez-Sebastián; Luis Lassaletta
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Telephone Usage and Cochlear Implant: Auditory Training Benefits.

Authors:  Aline Faria de Sousa; Ana Claudia Martinho de Carvalho; Maria Ines Vieira Couto; Robinson Koji Tsuji; Maria Valéria Schmidt Goffi-Gomez; Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Carla Gentile Matas; Debora Maria Befi-Lopes
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-11-28

8.  How safe is diathermy in patients with cochlear implants?

Authors:  S J Frampton; H Ismail-Koch; T E Mitchell
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.891

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.