Literature DB >> 17005437

Prognostic factors in head-and-neck cancer patients treated with surgery followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), 3D-conformal radiotherapy, or conventional radiotherapy.

Dirk Rades1, Fabian Fehlauer, Junes Wroblesky, Dirk Albers, Steven E Schild, Rainer Schmidt.   

Abstract

In 148 head-and-neck cancer patients treated with surgery plus radiotherapy (RT), IMRT, 3D-conformal RT, and conventional RT and 10 potential prognostic factors were evaluated for overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and loco-regional control (LC). On univariate analysis, ECOG performance status, T-stage, AJCC-stage, extent of resection, and pre-RT hemoglobin level (>or=12 g/dl better than <12 g/dl) were significantly associated with treatment outcome, whereas RT technique had no significant impact. On multivariate analysis, performance status maintained significance for OS (P=0.019), AJCC-stage for LC (P=0.034), extent of resection for OS (P=0.045) and MFS (P=0.021), pre-RT hemoglobin for MFS (P<0.001). IMRT was associated with less xerostomia than conformal RT and conventional RT (17% versus 63% and 73%, P=0.037). Otherwise, acute and late toxicity was similar. Outcome was significantly associated with performance status, tumor stage, extent of resection, and pre-RT hemoglobin. The three radiation techniques provided similar disease control. IMRT was effective in significantly reducing xerostomia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17005437     DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2006.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  12 in total

1.  Parotid gland-recovery after radiotherapy in the head and neck region--36 months follow-up of a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Jeremias Hey; Juergen Setz; Reinhard Gerlach; Martin Janich; Guido Hildebrandt; Dirk Vordermark; Christian R Gernhardt; Thomas Kuhnt
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 2.  A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: management strategies and economic impact.

Authors:  S B Jensen; A M L Pedersen; A Vissink; E Andersen; C G Brown; A N Davies; J Dutilh; J S Fulton; L Jankovic; N N F Lopes; A L S Mello; L V Muniz; C A Murdoch-Kinch; R G Nair; J J Napeñas; A Nogueira-Rodrigues; D Saunders; B Stirling; I von Bültzingslöwen; D S Weikel; L S Elting; F K L Spijkervet; M T Brennan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Interobserver variation in parotid gland delineation: a study of its impact on intensity-modulated radiotherapy solutions with a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  S W Loo; W M C Martin; P Smith; S Cherian; T W Roques
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  A systematic review of salivary gland hypofunction and xerostomia induced by cancer therapies: prevalence, severity and impact on quality of life.

Authors:  S B Jensen; A M L Pedersen; A Vissink; E Andersen; C G Brown; A N Davies; J Dutilh; J S Fulton; L Jankovic; N N F Lopes; A L S Mello; L V Muniz; C A Murdoch-Kinch; R G Nair; J J Napeñas; A Nogueira-Rodrigues; D Saunders; B Stirling; I von Bültzingslöwen; D S Weikel; L S Elting; F K L Spijkervet; M T Brennan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Prognostic Factors for Complete Recovery From Xerostomia After Radiotherapy of Head-and-Neck Cancers.

Authors:  Dirk Rades; Britta Warwas; Karsten Gerull; Ralph Pries; Anke Leichtle; Karl L Bruchhage; Samer G Hakim; Steven E Schild; Florian Cremers
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume Measured by (18)F-FDG PET/CT in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas Treated by Surgery.

Authors:  Kyu-Ho Choi; Ie Ryung Yoo; Eun Ji Han; Yeon Sil Kim; Gi Won Kim; Sae Jung Na; Dong-Il Sun; So Lyung Jung; Chan-Kwon Jung; Min-Sik Kim; So-Yeon Lee; Sung Hoon Kim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-11-16

7.  Comparison of survival rates between patients treated with conventional radiotherapy and helical tomotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Moonkyoo Kong; Seong Eon Hong; Jinhyun Choi; Youngkyong Kim
Journal:  Radiat Oncol J       Date:  2013-03-31

8.  Prolonged radiation time and low nadir hemoglobin during postoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy are both poor prognostic factors with synergistic effect on locally advanced head and neck cancer patients.

Authors:  Nai-Wen Su; Chung-Ji Liu; Yi-Shing Leu; Jehn-Chuan Lee; Yu-Jen Chen; Yi-Fang Chang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  The treatment outcome and radiation-induced toxicity for patients with head and neck carcinoma in the IMRT era: a systematic review with dosimetric and clinical parameters.

Authors:  Vassilis Kouloulias; Stella Thalassinou; Kalliopi Platoni; Anna Zygogianni; John Kouvaris; Christos Antypas; Efstathios Efstathopoulos; Kelekis Nikolaos
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Radiotherapy related skin toxicity (RAREST-01): Mepitel® film versus standard care in patients with locally advanced head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Carlos Narvaez; Claudia Doemer; Christian Idel; Cornelia Setter; Denise Olbrich; Zaza Ujmajuridze; Jesper Hansen Carl; Dirk Rades
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.