OBJECTIVE: A large proportion of women with a history of cervical cancer experience sexual problems as a result of treatment. The present study examined whether differences in sexual health between cervical cancer survivors and women with no history of cervical cancer could be explained by selected demographic, clinical, and psychosocial and physical factors. METHODS: Women treated between 1 and 5 years previously for stage 0 to II cervical cancer and age- and education-matched women with no history of cancer undergoing routine cervical cancer screening were recruited to participate. All participants had a partner with whom they had ever been sexually active. Women completed measures of sexual health, vaginal changes, partner relationship quality, perceived physical appearance, and sexual self-concept. RESULTS: Cervical cancer survivors reported significantly (p<.05) less sexual interest, more sexual dysfunction, and lower sexual satisfaction. The most consistent predictors of sexual health after treatment among survivors were time since diagnosis, receipt of radiotherapy, partner relations, and perceived physical appearance, as well as vaginal changes. These variables accounted for about 50% of the variance in sexual health outcomes. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that efforts to improve sexual health in women with a history of cervical cancer must move beyond the direct effects of cancer treatment on vaginal anatomy and physiology. Sexual rehabilitation interventions should consider partner relationships, perceived physical appearance, and women's attitudes toward themselves as sexual beings, in addition to vaginal changes. Future research should use prospective longitudinal research designs incorporating appropriate comparison groups to further explore this issue.
OBJECTIVE: A large proportion of women with a history of cervical cancer experience sexual problems as a result of treatment. The present study examined whether differences in sexual health between cervical cancer survivors and women with no history of cervical cancer could be explained by selected demographic, clinical, and psychosocial and physical factors. METHODS:Women treated between 1 and 5 years previously for stage 0 to II cervical cancer and age- and education-matched women with no history of cancer undergoing routine cervical cancer screening were recruited to participate. All participants had a partner with whom they had ever been sexually active. Women completed measures of sexual health, vaginal changes, partner relationship quality, perceived physical appearance, and sexual self-concept. RESULTS:Cervical cancer survivors reported significantly (p<.05) less sexual interest, more sexual dysfunction, and lower sexual satisfaction. The most consistent predictors of sexual health after treatment among survivors were time since diagnosis, receipt of radiotherapy, partner relations, and perceived physical appearance, as well as vaginal changes. These variables accounted for about 50% of the variance in sexual health outcomes. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that efforts to improve sexual health in women with a history of cervical cancer must move beyond the direct effects of cancer treatment on vaginal anatomy and physiology. Sexual rehabilitation interventions should consider partner relationships, perceived physical appearance, and women's attitudes toward themselves as sexual beings, in addition to vaginal changes. Future research should use prospective longitudinal research designs incorporating appropriate comparison groups to further explore this issue.
Authors: J L Hubbs; E L Dickson Michelson; R I Vogel; C L Rivard; D G K Teoh; Melissa A Geller Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2019-04-02 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Emily K Hill; Stacey Sandbo; Emily Abramsohn; Jennifer Makelarski; Kristen Wroblewski; Emily R Wenrich; Stacy McCoy; Sarah M Temkin; S Diane Yamada; Stacy T Lindau Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Simone Mara de Araújo Ferreira; Thais de Oliveira Gozzo; Marislei Sanches Panobianco; Manoel Antônio dos Santos; Ana Maria de Almeida Journal: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem Date: 2015 Jan-Feb
Authors: Jan M Eberth; Pratibha Prarelkar; Hoang Nguyen; Charlotte Sun; Jennifer Irvin-Vidrine; Linda S Elting Journal: Tex Public Health J Date: 2013-01
Authors: Christina M Wilson; Deborah B McGuire; Beth L Rodgers; R K Elswick; Sarah M Temkin Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2021 Sep-Oct 01 Impact factor: 2.592