Cynthia Owusu1, Timothy L Lash, Rebecca A Silliman. 1. Hematology and Medical Oncology Section, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Evans Biomedical Research Center, Boston, MA 02118-2393, USA. cynthia.owusu@bmc.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Assess the relationship between age and breast cancer-specific survival among older women and determine whether the observed age-related disparities in survival is explained by differences in breast cancer treatments received. METHODS: Women > or =65 years old at diagnosis with stage I-IIIA breast cancer diagnosed between 1997 and 1998 were recruited from four regions of the United States and followed prospectively for 5 years after diagnosis. Data was obtained from tumor registries, medical records, and telephone interviews. The primary endpoint was breast cancer-specific survival. Our independent variables were age operationalized as < or =75 years vs. >75 years, and receipt of recommended guideline therapy, adapted from the National Institutes of Health guideline consensus conference. RESULTS: Of 689 women, 36% were >75 years. Women >75 years were less likely to have received the following; axillary lymph node dissection (84% vs. 93%, P = 0.0003), radiotherapy (40% vs. 54%, P = 0.0003), definitive primary therapy (71% vs. 84%, P < 0.0001), chemotherapy (9% vs. 28%, P < 0.0001), and guideline therapy (31% vs. 54%, P < 0.0001). The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90%, 97%) for those < or =75 years who received guideline therapy, 94% (95% CI, 90%, 97%) for those < or =75 years who did not receive guideline therapy, 96% (95% CI, 88%, 99%) for those >75 years who received guideline therapy and 83% (95% CI, 74%, 89%) for those >75 years who did not receive guideline therapy, (P = 0.002) by the log-rank test. CONCLUSION: Receipt of guideline therapy may reduce the age-related disparity in breast cancer survival among older women.
OBJECTIVES: Assess the relationship between age and breast cancer-specific survival among older women and determine whether the observed age-related disparities in survival is explained by differences in breast cancer treatments received. METHODS:Women > or =65 years old at diagnosis with stage I-IIIA breast cancer diagnosed between 1997 and 1998 were recruited from four regions of the United States and followed prospectively for 5 years after diagnosis. Data was obtained from tumor registries, medical records, and telephone interviews. The primary endpoint was breast cancer-specific survival. Our independent variables were age operationalized as < or =75 years vs. >75 years, and receipt of recommended guideline therapy, adapted from the National Institutes of Health guideline consensus conference. RESULTS: Of 689 women, 36% were >75 years. Women >75 years were less likely to have received the following; axillary lymph node dissection (84% vs. 93%, P = 0.0003), radiotherapy (40% vs. 54%, P = 0.0003), definitive primary therapy (71% vs. 84%, P < 0.0001), chemotherapy (9% vs. 28%, P < 0.0001), and guideline therapy (31% vs. 54%, P < 0.0001). The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90%, 97%) for those < or =75 years who received guideline therapy, 94% (95% CI, 90%, 97%) for those < or =75 years who did not receive guideline therapy, 96% (95% CI, 88%, 99%) for those >75 years who received guideline therapy and 83% (95% CI, 74%, 89%) for those >75 years who did not receive guideline therapy, (P = 0.002) by the log-rank test. CONCLUSION: Receipt of guideline therapy may reduce the age-related disparity in breast cancer survival among older women.
Authors: Chetan Shenoy; Igor Klem; Anna Lisa Crowley; Manesh R Patel; Mark A Winchester; Cynthia Owusu; Gretchen G Kimmick Journal: Oncologist Date: 2011-07-07
Authors: Katherine E Reeder-Hayes; John Bainbridge; Anne Marie Meyer; Keith D Amos; Bryan J Weiner; Paul A Godley; William R Carpenter Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-02-22 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Clark Dumontier; Kerri M Clough-Gorr; Rebecca A Silliman; Andreas E Stuck; André Moser Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2016-12-13 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Heather B Neuman; Jessica R Schumacher; David F Schneider; Emily R Winslow; Rebecca A Busch; Jennifer L Tucholka; Maureen A Smith; Caprice C Greenberg Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-10-05 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Samuel N Forjuoh; Charles Huber; Jane N Bolin; Shivajirao P Patil; Manisha Gupta; Janet W Helduser; Sonia Holleman; Marcia G Ory Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2010-09-21