Literature DB >> 17003128

Characterization and prediction of protein-protein interactions within and between complexes.

Einat Sprinzak1, Yael Altuvia, Hanah Margalit.   

Abstract

Databases of experimentally determined protein interactions provide information on binary interactions and on involvement in multiprotein complexes. These data are valuable for understanding the general properties of the interaction between proteins as well as for the development of prediction schemes for unknown interactions. Here we analyze experimentally determined protein interactions by measuring various sequence, genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic attributes of each interacting pair in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We find that dividing the data into two groups, one that includes binary interactions within protein complexes (stable) and another that includes binary interactions that are not within complexes (transient), enables better characterization of the interactions by the different attributes and improves the prediction of new interactions. This analysis revealed that most attributes were more indicative in the set of intracomplex interactions. Using this data set for training, we integrated the different attributes by logistic regression and developed a predictive scheme that distinguishes between interacting and noninteracting protein pairs. Analysis of the logistic-regression model showed that one of the strongest contributors to the discrimination between interacting and noninteracting pairs is the presence of distinct pairs of domain signatures that were suggested previously to characterize interacting proteins. The predictive algorithm succeeds in identifying both intracomplex and other interactions (possibly the more stable ones), and its correct identification rate is 2-fold higher than that of large-scale yeast two-hybrid experiments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17003128      PMCID: PMC1595418          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0603352103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  54 in total

1.  Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events.

Authors:  A J Enright; I Iliopoulos; N C Kyrpides; C A Ouzounis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-11-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Ronald Jansen; Dov Greenbaum; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  The Hsp70-Ydj1 molecular chaperone represses the activity of the heme activator protein Hap1 in the absence of heme.

Authors:  T Hon; H C Lee; A Hach; J L Johnson; E A Craig; H Erdjument-Bromage; P Tempst; L Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions.

Authors:  Ioannis Xenarios; Lukasz Salwínski; Xiaoqun Joyce Duan; Patrick Higney; Sul-Min Kim; David Eisenberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences.

Authors:  H W Mewes; D Frishman; U Güldener; G Mannhaupt; K Mayer; M Mokrejs; B Morgenstern; M Münsterkötter; S Rudd; B Weil
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  H Ge; Z Liu; G M Church; M Vidal
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  A relationship between gene expression and protein interactions on the proteome scale: analysis of the bacteriophage T7 and the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  A Grigoriev
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Correlated sequence-signatures as markers of protein-protein interaction.

Authors:  E Sprinzak; H Margalit
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-08-24       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome.

Authors:  T Ito; T Chiba; R Ozawa; M Yoshida; M Hattori; Y Sakaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans.

Authors:  Siming Li; Christopher M Armstrong; Nicolas Bertin; Hui Ge; Stuart Milstein; Mike Boxem; Pierre-Olivier Vidalain; Jing-Dong J Han; Alban Chesneau; Tong Hao; Debra S Goldberg; Ning Li; Monica Martinez; Jean-François Rual; Philippe Lamesch; Lai Xu; Muneesh Tewari; Sharyl L Wong; Lan V Zhang; Gabriel F Berriz; Laurent Jacotot; Philippe Vaglio; Jérôme Reboul; Tomoko Hirozane-Kishikawa; Qianru Li; Harrison W Gabel; Ahmed Elewa; Bridget Baumgartner; Debra J Rose; Haiyuan Yu; Stephanie Bosak; Reynaldo Sequerra; Andrew Fraser; Susan E Mango; William M Saxton; Susan Strome; Sander Van Den Heuvel; Fabio Piano; Jean Vandenhaute; Claude Sardet; Mark Gerstein; Lynn Doucette-Stamm; Kristin C Gunsalus; J Wade Harper; Michael E Cusick; Frederick P Roth; David E Hill; Marc Vidal
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-02       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Integrating physical and genetic maps: from genomes to interaction networks.

Authors:  Andreas Beyer; Sourav Bandyopadhyay; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Protein interaction predictions from diverse sources.

Authors:  Yin Liu; Inyoung Kim; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  Predicting physical interactions between protein complexes.

Authors:  Trevor Clancy; Einar Andreas Rødland; Ståle Nygard; Eivind Hovig
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Predicting protein-protein interactions in Arabidopsis thaliana through integration of orthology, gene ontology and co-expression.

Authors:  Stefanie De Bodt; Sebastian Proost; Klaas Vandepoele; Pierre Rouzé; Yves Van de Peer
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-06-29       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Getting a grip on complexes.

Authors:  Yan Nie; Cristina Viola; Christoph Bieniossek; Simon Trowitzsch; Lakshmi Sumitra Vijay-Achandran; Maxime Chaillet; Frederic Garzoni; Imre Berger
Journal:  Curr Genomics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.236

6.  Inferring modules from human protein interactome classes.

Authors:  Elisabetta Marras; Antonella Travaglione; Gautam Chaurasia; Matthias Futschik; Enrico Capobianco
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2010-07-23

Review 7.  What we can learn about Escherichia coli through application of Gene Ontology.

Authors:  James C Hu; Peter D Karp; Ingrid M Keseler; Markus Krummenacker; Deborah A Siegele
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 8.  Features of protein-protein interactions that translate into potent inhibitors: topology, surface area and affinity.

Authors:  Matthew C Smith; Jason E Gestwicki
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Med       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 5.600

9.  'Double water exclusion': a hypothesis refining the O-ring theory for the hot spots at protein interfaces.

Authors:  Jinyan Li; Qian Liu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Triangle network motifs predict complexes by complementing high-error interactomes with structural information.

Authors:  Bill Andreopoulos; Christof Winter; Dirk Labudde; Michael Schroeder
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.