Literature DB >> 17001137

Use of the mini-clinical evaluation exercise to rate examinee performance on a multiple-station clinical skills examination: a validity study.

Melissa J Margolis1, Brian E Clauser, Monica M Cuddy, Andrea Ciccone, Janet Mee, Polina Harik, Richard E Hawkins.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multivariate generalizability analysis was used to investigate the performance of a commonly used clinical evaluation tool.
METHOD: Practicing physicians were trained to use the mini-Clinical Skills Examination (CEX) rating form to rate performances from the United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 2 Clinical Skills examination.
RESULTS: Differences in rater stringency made the greatest contribution to measurement error; more raters rating each examinee, even on fewer occasions, could enhance score stability. Substantial correlated error across the competencies suggests that decisions about one scale unduly influence those on others.
CONCLUSIONS: Given the appearance of a halo effect across competencies, score interpretations that assume assessment of distinct dimensions of clinical performance should be made with caution. If the intention is to produce a single composite score by combining results across competencies, the presence of these effects may be less critical.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17001137     DOI: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000236514.53194.f4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  11 in total

1.  Validity and Feasibility of the Minicard Direct Observation Tool in 1 Training Program.

Authors:  Anthony A Donato; Yoon Soo Park; David L George; Alan Schwartz; Rachel Yudkowsky
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

2.  Effect of rater training on reliability and accuracy of mini-CEX scores: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  David A Cook; Denise M Dupras; Thomas J Beckman; Kris G Thomas; V Shane Pankratz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Using systematically observed clinical encounters (SOCEs) to assess medical students' skills in clinical settings.

Authors:  George R Bergus; Jerold C Woodhead; Clarence D Kreiter
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2010-11-19

4.  A laboratory study on the reliability estimations of the mini-CEX.

Authors:  Alberto Alves de Lima; Diego Conde; Juan Costabel; Juan Corso; Cees Van der Vleuten
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 3.853

Review 5.  In-training assessment using direct observation of single-patient encounters: a literature review.

Authors:  E A M Pelgrim; A W M Kramer; H G A Mokkink; L van den Elsen; R P T M Grol; C P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2010-06-18       Impact factor: 3.853

6.  A short questionnaire to assess pediatric resident's competencies: the validation process.

Authors:  Liviana Da Dalt; Pasquale Anselmi; Silvia Bressan; Silvia Carraro; Eugenio Baraldi; Egidio Robusto; Giorgio Perilongo
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 2.638

7.  Variability and dimensionality of students' and supervisors' mini-CEX scores in undergraduate medical clerkships - a multilevel factor analysis.

Authors:  Christoph Berendonk; Anja Rogausch; Armin Gemperli; Wolfgang Himmel
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Validity, reliability and feasibility of a new observation rating tool and a post encounter rating tool for the assessment of clinical reasoning skills of medical students during their internal medicine clerkship: a pilot study.

Authors:  Catharina M Haring; Claudia C R Klaarwater; Geert A Bouwmans; Bernadette M Cools; Petra J M van Gurp; Jos W M van der Meer; Cornelis T Postma
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Validity of a new assessment rubric for a short-answer test of clinical reasoning.

Authors:  Euson Yeung; Kulamakan Kulasagarem; Nicole Woods; Adam Dubrowski; Brian Hodges; Heather Carnahan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Inter-rater reliability in clinical assessments: do examiner pairings influence candidate ratings?

Authors:  Aileen Faherty; Tim Counihan; Thomas Kropmans; Yvonne Finn
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.