Literature DB >> 17000053

The effect of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor blockade on acetylcholine efflux in the dorsomedial striatum during response reversal learning.

C A Palencia1, M E Ragozzino.   

Abstract

Separate experiments found that activation of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors or increased acetylcholine (ACh) efflux in the rat dorsomedial striatum is critical for learning when conditions require a shift in strategies. Increasing evidence indicates that NMDA receptor activity affects cholinergic efflux in the basal ganglia. The present studies determined whether NMDA receptor blockade in the dorsomedial striatum with dl-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid (AP-5) affects dorsomedial striatal ACh output in a resting condition, as well as during response reversal learning. Experiment 1 investigated the effects of AP-5 (12.5, 25 or 50 muM) infused into the dorsomedial striatum on ACh output in a resting condition. AP-5 infusion at 25 and 50 muM led to a 20% and 40% decrease in dorsomedial striatal ACh output, respectively. AP-5 (12.5 muM) infusion did not change dorsomedial striatal ACh output from basal levels. Experiment 2 determined whether dorsomedial striatal ACh efflux increases during response reversal learning and whether AP-5, at a dose that does not affect basal levels, modifies response reversal learning and ACh efflux. Following acquisition of a response discrimination, rats had microdialysis probes bilaterally inserted into the dorsomedial striatum prior to the reversal learning test. After baseline samples, rats received a response reversal learning test for 30 min. Control rats rapidly improved in the reversal learning session while simultaneously exhibiting an approximately 40% increase in ACh output compared with baseline levels. AP-5 (12.5 muM) treatment during testing significantly impaired response reversal learning while concomitantly blocking an increase in ACh output. These findings suggest that NMDA receptor activation in the dorsomedial striatum may facilitate a shift in response patterns, in part, by increasing ACh efflux.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17000053      PMCID: PMC3206594          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  47 in total

1.  Lesions of dorsolateral striatum preserve outcome expectancy but disrupt habit formation in instrumental learning.

Authors:  Henry H Yin; Barbara J Knowlton; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Differential effects of M1 muscarinic receptor blockade and nicotinic receptor blockade in the dorsomedial striatum on response reversal learning.

Authors:  Arianna Tzavos; Jane Jih; Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Dorsal striatum and stimulus-response learning: lesions of the dorsolateral, but not dorsomedial, striatum impair acquisition of a stimulus-response-based instrumental discrimination task, while sparing conditioned place preference learning.

Authors:  R E Featherstone; R J McDonald
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Switching memory systems during learning: changes in patterns of brain acetylcholine release in the hippocampus and striatum in rats.

Authors:  Qing Chang; Paul E Gold
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Involvement of the dorsomedial striatum in behavioral flexibility: role of muscarinic cholinergic receptors.

Authors:  Michael E Ragozzino; Jane Jih; Arianna Tzavos
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Inactivation of dorsolateral striatum impairs acquisition of response learning in cue-deficient, but not cue-available, conditions.

Authors:  Qing Chang; Paul E Gold
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Dynamic changes in acetylcholine output in the medial striatum during place reversal learning.

Authors:  Michael E Ragozzino; Daniel Choi
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Dorsal striatum and stimulus-response learning: lesions of the dorsolateral, but not dorsomedial, striatum impair acquisition of a simple discrimination task.

Authors:  R E Featherstone; R J McDonald
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Acetylcholine modulation of neural systems involved in learning and memory.

Authors:  Paul E Gold
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.877

10.  A dissociation of dorso-lateral striatum and amygdala function on the same stimulus-response habit task.

Authors:  R J McDonald; N S Hong
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  20 in total

1.  The parafascicular thalamic nucleus concomitantly influences behavioral flexibility and dorsomedial striatal acetylcholine output in rats.

Authors:  Holden D Brown; Phillip M Baker; Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Human reversal learning under conditions of certain versus uncertain outcomes.

Authors:  Anna-Maria D'Cruz; Michael E Ragozzino; Matthew W Mosconi; Mani N Pavuluri; John A Sweeney
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Differential involvement of M1-type and M4-type muscarinic cholinergic receptors in the dorsomedial striatum in task switching.

Authors:  Martha F McCool; Sima Patel; Ravi Talati; Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 2.877

4.  The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, escitalopram, enhances inhibition of prepotent responding and spatial reversal learning.

Authors:  Holden D Brown; Dionisio A Amodeo; John A Sweeney; Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 4.153

Review 5.  The cholinergic system and neostriatal memory functions.

Authors:  Robbert Havekes; Ted Abel; Eddy A Van der Zee
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  The neural basis of reversal learning: An updated perspective.

Authors:  A Izquierdo; J L Brigman; A K Radke; P H Rudebeck; A Holmes
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus lesions impair probabilistic reversal learning by reducing sensitivity to positive reward feedback.

Authors:  Anam Syed; Phillip M Baker; Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.877

Review 8.  The role of acetylcholine in cocaine addiction.

Authors:  Mark J Williams; Bryon Adinoff
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Cognitive flexibility impairment and reduced frontal cortex BDNF expression in the ouabain model of mania.

Authors:  Dionisio A Amodeo; Gena Grospe; Hui Zang; Yogesh Dwivedi; Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Risperidone and the 5-HT2A receptor antagonist M100907 improve probabilistic reversal learning in BTBR T + tf/J mice.

Authors:  Dionisio A Amodeo; Joshua H Jones; John A Sweeney; Michael E Ragozzino
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 5.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.