Literature DB >> 16999093

Critical assessment of chelant-enhanced metal phytoextraction.

Bernd Nowack1, Rainer Schulin, Brett H Robinson.   

Abstract

Chelant-enhanced phytoextraction has received a lot of attention in the past decade. In theory, this technique could cleanse metal polluted soils by solubilizing contaminating metals, allowing them to be taken up by plants that would subsequently be removed from the site. We review the processes of metal solubilization, uptake by plants, and leaching during chelant-enhanced phytoextraction. A large excess of chelant is required to solubilize the target metal due to the co-solubilization of Ca and Fe. Chelated metals are taken up via the apoplastic pathway. Disruption of the Casparian Band is required to achieve the high shoot concentrations needed for phytoextraction. Therefore, adding chelants to a soil increases not only the total dissolved metal concentration but also changes the primary route of plant metal-uptake from the symplastic to the apoplastic pathway. Depending on metal, plant species, and chelant concentration, significant increases in metal uptake are likely. Soil solution chelate concentrations of at least several mM are required to induce appreciable shoot concentrations. A simple calculation reveals that at such soil solution concentrations plants will remove only a small fraction of the solubilized metals. Leaching, exacerbated by preferential flow processes, is unavoidable. Chelant-enhanced phytoextraction is therefore limited to areas where the connection with groundwater has been broken, orwhere leaching is unimportant. Chelant-enhanced phytoextraction may nonetheless have a role in enhancing the uptake of essential trace metals. Such a role warrants further investigations into the use of biodegradable chelants such as ethylenediaminedisuccinic acid (EDDS).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16999093     DOI: 10.1021/es0604919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  27 in total

1.  Experimental determinations of soil copper toxicity to lettuce (Lactuca sativa) growth in highly different copper spiked and aged soils.

Authors:  Karen S Christiansen; Ole K Borggaard; Peter E Holm; Martina G Vijver; Michael Z Hauschild; Willie J G M Peijnenburg
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Impact of lime-stabilized biosolid application on Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn mobility in an acidic soil.

Authors:  Yannick Mamindy-Pajany; Stéphanie Sayen; Emmanuel Guillon
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Heavy metal phytoextraction-natural and EDTA-assisted remediation of contaminated calcareous soils by sorghum and oat.

Authors:  Muhammad Mahmood-Ul-Hassan; Vishandas Suthar; Rizwan Ahmad; Munazza Yousra
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Metal partitioning in plant-substrate-water compartments under EDDS-assisted phytoextraction of pyrite waste with Brassica carinata A. Braun.

Authors:  T Vamerali; M Bandiera; P Lucchini; G Mosca
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Lead uptake by the symbiotic Daucus carota L.-Glomus intraradices system and its effect on the morphology of extra- and intraradical fungal microstructures.

Authors:  Carlos Juan Alvarado-López; Nabanita Dasgupta-Schubert; Jorge Enrique Ambriz; Juan Carlos Arteaga-Velazquez; Javier A Villegas
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  Bioremediation of copper-contaminated soils by bacteria.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Cornu; David Huguenot; Karine Jézéquel; Marc Lollier; Thierry Lebeau
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  EDTA ameliorates phytoextraction of lead and plant growth by reducing morphological and biochemical injuries in Brassica napus L. under lead stress.

Authors:  Urooj Kanwal; Shafaqat Ali; Muhammad Bilal Shakoor; Mujahid Farid; Sabir Hussain; Tahira Yasmeen; Muhammad Adrees; Saima Aslam Bharwana; Farhat Abbas
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 8.  Assessment of successful experiments and limitations of phytotechnologies: contaminant uptake, detoxification and sequestration, and consequences for food safety.

Authors:  Michel Mench; Jean-Paul Schwitzguébel; Peter Schroeder; Valérie Bert; Stanislaw Gawronski; Satish Gupta
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Heavy metals distribution and risk assessment in soil from an informal E-waste recycling site in Lagos State, Nigeria.

Authors:  Khadijah A Isimekhai; Hemda Garelick; John Watt; Diane Purchase
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 4.223

10.  Metal distribution and spectroscopic analysis after soil washing with chelating agents and humic substances.

Authors:  Daniel C W Tsang; Neil R Hartley
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.