OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a 3-dimensional (3D) sonographic method for the measurement of volumetric flow under conditions of known flow rates and Doppler angles. METHODS: A GE/Kretz Voluson 730 system (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) and RAB2-5 probe were used to acquire 3D Doppler measurements in a custom flow phantom. Blood-mimicking fluid circulated by a computer-controlled pump provided a range of flow velocities (2-15 mL/s). A 6-axis positioning system maneuvered the ultrasound probe through a range of angles (40 degrees-70 degrees and 110 degrees -140 degrees) with respect to the tube (orthogonal to the tube being 90 degrees). Volume data sets were obtained spanning 29 degrees lateral and 20 degrees elevational angles encompassing the flow tube in a scanning time of less than 10 seconds. Power Doppler data were used to correct for partial volume effects. RESULTS: Using a single angle (110 degrees) with respect to the flow tube, measured and actual volume flow rates were within the 95% confidence interval over the full range of flow rates. At flow rates of 5 and 10 mL/s, the measured volume flow rates were all within +/-15% of actual values for the range of angles tested and also stayed within the 95% confidence interval. CONCLUSIONS: Direct comparisons of volume flow rates estimated with 3D sonography and known flow rates showed that the method has good accuracy. Subsequent comparisons under pulsatile and in vivo conditions will be needed to verify this performance for clinical applications.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a 3-dimensional (3D) sonographic method for the measurement of volumetric flow under conditions of known flow rates and Doppler angles. METHODS: A GE/Kretz Voluson 730 system (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI) and RAB2-5 probe were used to acquire 3D Doppler measurements in a custom flow phantom. Blood-mimicking fluid circulated by a computer-controlled pump provided a range of flow velocities (2-15 mL/s). A 6-axis positioning system maneuvered the ultrasound probe through a range of angles (40 degrees-70 degrees and 110 degrees -140 degrees) with respect to the tube (orthogonal to the tube being 90 degrees). Volume data sets were obtained spanning 29 degrees lateral and 20 degrees elevational angles encompassing the flow tube in a scanning time of less than 10 seconds. Power Doppler data were used to correct for partial volume effects. RESULTS: Using a single angle (110 degrees) with respect to the flow tube, measured and actual volume flow rates were within the 95% confidence interval over the full range of flow rates. At flow rates of 5 and 10 mL/s, the measured volume flow rates were all within +/-15% of actual values for the range of angles tested and also stayed within the 95% confidence interval. CONCLUSIONS: Direct comparisons of volume flow rates estimated with 3D sonography and known flow rates showed that the method has good accuracy. Subsequent comparisons under pulsatile and in vivo conditions will be needed to verify this performance for clinical applications.
Authors: Oliver D Kripfgans; Jonathan M Rubin; Stephen Z Pinter; James Jago; Ron Leichner; J Brian Fowlkes Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2019-08-09 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Oliver D Kripfgans; Stephen Z Pinter; Cristel Baiu; Matthew F Bruce; Paul L Carson; Shigao Chen; Todd N Erpelding; Jing Gao; Mark E Lockhart; Andy Milkowski; Nancy Obuchowski; Michelle L Robbin; Jonathan M Rubin; James A Zagzebski; J Brian Fowlkes Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Alec W Welsh; J Brian Fowlkes; Stephen Z Pinter; Kimberly A Ives; Gabe E Owens; Jonathan M Rubin; Oliver D Kripfgans; Pádraig Looney; Sally L Collins; Gordon N Stevenson Journal: Radiology Date: 2019-10-01 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jaydev K Dave; Maureen E Mc Donald; Praveen Mehrotra; Andrew R Kohut; John R Eisenbrey; Flemming Forsberg Journal: Ultrasonics Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Michael S Richards; Oliver D Kripfgans; Jonathan M Rubin; Anne L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2009-10-12 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Flemming Forsberg; Alan D Stein; Daniel A Merton; Kathryn J Lipcan; Donald Herzog; Laurence Parker; Laurence Needleman Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Stephen Z Pinter; Jonathan M Rubin; Oliver D Kripfgans; Marjorie C Treadwell; Vivian C Romero; Michael S Richards; Man Zhang; Anne L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Jonathan M Rubin; Sibo Li; J Brian Fowlkes; Shriram Sethuraman; Oliver D Kripfgans; William Shi; Marjorie C Treadwell; James R Jago; Ronald D Leichner; Stephen Z Pinter Journal: J Ultrasound Med Date: 2020-08-07 Impact factor: 2.153