Literature DB >> 16997500

Bypassing the learning curve in permanent seed implants using state-of-the-art technology.

Luc Beaulieu1, Dee-Ann Radford Evans, Sylviane Aubin, Steven Angyalfi, Siraj Husain, Ian Kay, André-Guy Martin, Nicolas Varfalvy, Eric Vigneault, Peter Dunscombe.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate, based on clinical postplan dose distributions, that technology can be used efficiently to eliminate the learning curve associated with permanent seed implant planning and delivery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dose distributions evaluated 30 days after the implant of the initial 22 consecutive patients treated with permanent seed implants at two institutions were studied. Institution 1 (I1) consisted of a new team, whereas institution 2 (I2) had performed more than 740 preplanned implantations over a 9-year period before the study. Both teams had adopted similar integrated systems based on three-dimensional (3D) transrectal ultrasonography, intraoperative dosimetry, and an automated seed delivery and needle retraction system (FIRST, Nucletron). Procedure time and dose volume histogram parameters such as D90, V100, V150, V200, and others were collected in the operating room and at 30 days postplan.
RESULTS: The average target coverage from the intraoperative plan (V100) was 99.4% for I1 and 99.9% for I2. D90, V150, and V200 were 191.4 Gy (196.3 Gy), 75.3% (73.0%), and 37.5% (34.1%) for I1 (I2) respectively. None of these parameters shows a significant difference between institutions. The postplan D90 was 151.2 Gy for I1 and 167.3 Gy for I2, well above the 140 Gy from the Stock et al. analysis, taking into account differences at planning, results in a p value of 0.0676. The procedure time required on average 174.4 min for I1 and 89 min for I2. The time was found to decrease with the increasing number of patients.
CONCLUSION: State-of-the-art technology enables a new brachytherapy team to obtain excellent postplan dose distributions, similar to those achieved by an experienced team with proven long-term clinical results. The cost for bypassing the usual dosimetry learning curve is time, with increasing team experience resulting in shorter treatment times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16997500     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.07.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  7 in total

1.  Canadian prostate brachytherapy in 2012.

Authors:  Mira Keyes; Juanita Crook; W James Morris; Gerard Morton; Tom Pickles; Nawaid Usmani; Eric Vigneault
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Simulation as More Than a Treatment-Planning Tool: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Radiation Oncology Simulation-Based Medical Education.

Authors:  Michael K Rooney; Fan Zhu; Erin F Gillespie; Jillian R Gunther; Ryan P McKillip; Matthew Lineberry; Ara Tekian; Daniel W Golden
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Evaluation of dosimetry and excess seeds in permanent brachytherapy using a modified hybrid method: a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Kana Kobayashi; Koji Okihara; Tsuyoshi Iwata; Norihiro Aibe; Naohiro Kodani; Takuji Tsubokura; Kazumi Kamoi; Tsuneharu Miki; Hideya Yamazaki
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.724

4.  Iodine-125 seed brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancer: a single-institution review.

Authors:  Simon Zuber; Susan Weiß; Dieter Baaske; Michael Schöpe; Simon Stevens; Stephan Bodis; Daniel R Zwahlen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Is intraoperative real-time dosimetry in prostate seed brachytherapy predictive of biochemical outcome?

Authors:  Daniel Taussky; Levon Igidbashian; David Donath; Dominic Béliveau-Nadeauv; Renée X Larouche; Yanick Hervieux; Guila Delouya
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2017-06-22

6.  Hybrid optimization based on non-coplanar needles for brachytherapy dose planning.

Authors:  Xiaodong Ma; Zhiyong Yang; Shan Jiang; Guobin Zhang; Bin Huo; Shude Chai
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2019-06-28

7.  Hybrid TRUS/CT with optical tracking for target delineation in image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Stéphanie Smet; Nicole Nesvacil; Johannes Knoth; Alina Sturdza; Dina Najjari-Jamal; Filip Jelinek; Gernot Kronreif; Richard Pötter; Joachim Widder; Christian Kirisits; Maximilian P Schmid
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 3.621

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.