Literature DB >> 16996556

Spatial vs temporal continuity in view invariant visual object recognition learning.

Gavin Perry1, Edmund T Rolls, Simon M Stringer.   

Abstract

We show in a 4-layer competitive neuronal network that continuous transformation learning, which uses spatial correlations and a purely associative (Hebbian) synaptic modification rule, can build view invariant representations of complex 3D objects. This occurs even when views of the different objects are interleaved, a condition where temporal trace learning fails. Human psychophysical experiments showed that view invariant object learning can occur when spatial but not temporal continuity applies because of interleaving of stimuli, although sequential presentation, which produces temporal continuity, can facilitate learning. Thus continuous transformation learning is an important principle that may contribute to view invariant object recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16996556     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.07.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  12 in total

1.  Invariant Visual Object and Face Recognition: Neural and Computational Bases, and a Model, VisNet.

Authors:  Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 2.380

2.  Continuous transformation learning of translation invariant representations.

Authors:  G Perry; E T Rolls; S M Stringer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Self-organising coordinate transformation with peaked and monotonic gain modulation in the primate dorsal visual pathway.

Authors:  Daniel M Navarro; Bedeho M W Mender; Hannah E Smithson; Simon M Stringer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Spatiotemporal information during unsupervised learning enhances viewpoint invariant object recognition.

Authors:  Moqian Tian; Kalanit Grill-Spector
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Perceptual learning of view-independence in visuo-haptic object representations.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Marisa Pappas; Alexandra Kreps; Kevin Lee; K Sathian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Learned Non-Rigid Object Motion is a View-Invariant Cue to Recognizing Novel Objects.

Authors:  Lewis L Chuang; Quoc C Vuong; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Learning view invariant recognition with partially occluded objects.

Authors:  James M Tromans; Irina Higgins; Simon M Stringer
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Invariant visual object recognition: biologically plausible approaches.

Authors:  Leigh Robinson; Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 2.086

9.  How lateral connections and spiking dynamics may separate multiple objects moving together.

Authors:  Benjamin D Evans; Simon M Stringer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Deformation-specific and deformation-invariant visual object recognition: pose vs. identity recognition of people and deforming objects.

Authors:  Tristan J Webb; Edmund T Rolls
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.