Literature DB >> 16996332

Risk management considerations and the pregnancy handheld record. An audit of the return rate of the pregnancy handheld record.

Jocelyn Toohill1, Barbara Soong, Melissa Meldrum.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Risk management is integral to the provision of contemporary health care. As maternity practices change and with a commitment on women being at the centre of care, one strategy has been for women to retain their records during the antenatal period. This paper explores the return rate of the pregnancy handheld record in a major tertiary facility and discusses the risk management implications when the record is not available upon presentation to the treating practitioner. PROCEDURE: Four audits were conducted over a 2 year period to determine the return rate of the pregnancy handheld record at time of admission for labour and birth. A total of 1096 records were returned out of a possible 1256 during the study.
FINDINGS: A 6.6% increase in the return rate was achieved over the 4 audit periods (82-88.5%) with an overall return rate of 85%. PRINCIPLE
CONCLUSIONS: Our audit highlights the need for consumers, clinicians and heath care facilities to consider the advantages and disadvantages of the pregnancy handheld record, as well as the medico-legal responsibilities that ultimately fall back on the health facility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16996332     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2006.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  5 in total

1.  Synthesis of informatics literature to support institutional policy statement development.

Authors:  Taneya Y Koonce; Nila A Sathe; Dario A Giuse; Jim Jirjis
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2008-01

2.  The content and completeness of women-held maternity documents before admission for labour: A mixed methods study in Banjul, The Gambia.

Authors:  Lotta Gustafsson; Fides Lu; Faith Rickard; Christine MacArthur; Carole Cummins; Ivan Coker; Kebba Mane; Kebba Manneh; Amie Wilson; Semira Manaseki-Holland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Facilitating better postnatal care with women-held documents in The Gambia: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Tiffany Gooden; Lotta Gustafsson; Fides Lu; Faith Rickard; Alice Sitch; Carole Cummins; Kebba Manneh; Amie Wilson; Christine MacArthur; Semira Manaseki-Holland
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Patient-Held Maternal and/or Child Health Records: Meeting the Information Needs of Patients and Healthcare Providers in Developing Countries?

Authors:  Kathleen E Turner; Sherrilynne Fuller
Journal:  Online J Public Health Inform       Date:  2011-11-07

Review 5.  In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Glenda Hawley; Tina Janamian; Claire Jackson; Shelley A Wilkinson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.