Christopher L Drake1, Catherine Jefferson, Timothy Roehrs, Thomas Roth. 1. Henry Ford Hospital Sleep Disorders and Research Center, and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, Wayne State College of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. cdrake1@hfhs.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the sleep response to caffeine in individuals vulnerable to stress-related sleep disturbance as measured by polysomnography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven healthy individuals without insomnia scoring low (4 women, mean age=32.64+/-15.46 years) and 10 healthy individuals also without insomnia scoring high (6 women, mean age=34.20+/-13.73 years) on a measure of vulnerability to stress-related sleep disturbance were studied in a laboratory protocol. A moderate-low dose of caffeine (3 mg/kg) was administered 1h prior to lights-out and compared to a counterbalanced control night with each condition separated by 1 week. Standard polysomnographic measures were assessed (i.e. total sleep time, sleep efficiency, latency to persistent sleep, and sleep stage percentages) for both control and caffeine nights. RESULTS: There were no between-group differences in sleep on the control night. Importantly, individuals reporting vulnerability to stress-related sleep disturbance had significantly prolonged latency to persistent sleep in response to the caffeine challenge (interaction; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Normal sleepers with an identified vulnerability to stress-induced sleep disturbance exhibited greater objectively verifiable sleep-reactivity in response to a caffeine challenge compared to non-vulnerable individuals. These results suggest that the construct of individual differences in vulnerability to sleep disturbance applies to a pharmacological 'stressor' (i.e. caffeine) as well as to previously assessed stressors such as a first-night effect. This finding provides further support for generalized trait vulnerability by demonstrating a sleep disturbance to a wake-promoting pharmacological challenge in specific a priori identified individuals.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the sleep response to caffeine in individuals vulnerable to stress-related sleep disturbance as measured by polysomnography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eleven healthy individuals without insomnia scoring low (4 women, mean age=32.64+/-15.46 years) and 10 healthy individuals also without insomnia scoring high (6 women, mean age=34.20+/-13.73 years) on a measure of vulnerability to stress-related sleep disturbance were studied in a laboratory protocol. A moderate-low dose of caffeine (3 mg/kg) was administered 1h prior to lights-out and compared to a counterbalanced control night with each condition separated by 1 week. Standard polysomnographic measures were assessed (i.e. total sleep time, sleep efficiency, latency to persistent sleep, and sleep stage percentages) for both control and caffeine nights. RESULTS: There were no between-group differences in sleep on the control night. Importantly, individuals reporting vulnerability to stress-related sleep disturbance had significantly prolonged latency to persistent sleep in response to the caffeine challenge (interaction; P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Normal sleepers with an identified vulnerability to stress-induced sleep disturbance exhibited greater objectively verifiable sleep-reactivity in response to a caffeine challenge compared to non-vulnerable individuals. These results suggest that the construct of individual differences in vulnerability to sleep disturbance applies to a pharmacological 'stressor' (i.e. caffeine) as well as to previously assessed stressors such as a first-night effect. This finding provides further support for generalized trait vulnerability by demonstrating a sleep disturbance to a wake-promoting pharmacological challenge in specific a priori identified individuals.
Authors: T Hori; Y Sugita; E Koga; S Shirakawa; K Inoue; S Uchida; H Kuwahara; M Kousaka; T Kobayashi; Y Tsuji; M Terashima; K Fukuda; N Fukuda Journal: Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2001-06 Impact factor: 5.188
Authors: Catherine D Jefferson; Christopher L Drake; Holly M Scofield; Eric Myers; Tara McClure; Timothy Roehrs; Thomas Roth Journal: Sleep Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: David A Kalmbach; James L Abelson; J Todd Arnedt; Zhuo Zhao; Jessica R Schubert; Srijan Sen Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 3.492