Literature DB >> 16995851

Measuring outcomes in acute neurorehabilitation in General Hospital setting - our experience.

Emela Mujić-Skikić1, Suad Trebinjac, Dijana Avdić, Amra Dzumhur-Sarić.   

Abstract

In General Hospital setting, where varieties of patients are included in neurorehabilitation process, set of multidisciplinary functional tests were established, as a routine in daily work. Tests were done by physiotherapists and occupational therapists who were members of rehabilitation team. Our aim was to select the tests which can be used as a routine and are applicable for different neurological impairments in daily work. Tests were applied to inpatients admitted to the Medical, Trauma, Neurology and Neurosurgery wards in the Rashid Hospital, DOHMS, Dubai. Fifty inpatients with different neurological impairments admitted to totally 8 wards, were tested in the beginning of rehabilitation process and on discharge from the hospital. Nine tests were used as standardized tests for measuring motor, cognitive, focal impairment, ADL activities and disability: Motricity Index, Trunk Control Test, Standing Balance score, Functional Ambulation Categories test, Mini Mental State Examination, Canadian Neurological Scale, Action Research Arm test, Bartel Index and Functional Independent Measurements. FIM, Motricity Index and Trunk Control Test were applicable for all tested patients, with required adaptation for different neurological conditions within the same score. Other tests were not applicable for all patients as routine, but there were very useful for certain number of patients as a measurement of functional improvement. It is very important to have proper setup of tests, which are simple, reliable and valid for measuring impairment, disability and handicap and which can be used as standardized part of assessment protocol. Also, they must be applicable for different neurological impairments to monitor treatment progress. Combination of tests performed by different professionals and comprehensive approach of all team members is very important for measuring outcomes in rehabilitation and evaluating patient's impairment and disability. Proper hospital setup, optimal number of staff, good communication and team work are leading to better outcome in neurorehabilitation process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16995851      PMCID: PMC7193667     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci        ISSN: 1512-8601            Impact factor:   3.363


  16 in total

Review 1.  The ICIDH-2: developments for a new era of outcomes research.

Authors:  D B Gray; G E Hendershot
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 2.  Activity-related quality of life in rehabilitation and traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Mark V Johnston; Carol S Miklos
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study.

Authors:  C Collin; D Wade
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Research in physical medicine and rehabilitation. XII. Measurement tools with application to brain injury.

Authors:  M V Johnston; T W Findley; J DeLuca; R T Katz
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  Retrospective assessment of initial stroke severity with the Canadian Neurological Scale.

Authors:  L B Goldstein; V Chilukuri
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't.

Authors:  D L Sackett; W M Rosenberg; J A Gray; R B Haynes; W S Richardson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-13

Review 7.  The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures.

Authors:  M E Cohen; R J Marino
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Prediction of long-term outcome in the early hours following acute ischemic stroke. Italian Acute Stroke Study Group.

Authors:  M Fiorelli; A Alpérovitch; C Argentino; M L Sacchetti; D Toni; G Sette; C Cavalletti; M C Gori; C Fieschi
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1995-03

9.  Scoring alternatives for FIM in neurological disorders applying Rasch analysis.

Authors:  A L Nilsson; K S Sunnerhagen; G Grimby
Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.209

10.  Evidence-based measurement: which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation?

Authors:  J C Hobart; D L Lamping; J A Freeman; D W Langdon; D L McLellan; R J Greenwood; A J Thompson
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-08-28       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.