A L Nilsson1, K S Sunnerhagen, G Grimby. 1. Institute of Clinical Neuro Science, Rehabilitation Medicine, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is an internationally widely used outcome measure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the structural properties of FIM using the Rasch model, with regard to scoring within rehabilitation centres in Scandinavia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: FIM data from 1660 patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury were analysed. The best models with respect to person separation were determined, together with person reliability, item separation, disordered categories, distance of more than 1.4 logits between categories and item fit to the model. RESULTS: Analysis showed disordering using seven categories in all three diagnoses. After collapsing of categories a four-category scale was the best solution. CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing the categories from seven to four may be one way of dealing with problems of disordered thresholds. Further studies are also needed in order to try the suggested scale in clinical settings and to compare it with the original FIM scale.
OBJECTIVE: The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is an internationally widely used outcome measure. The aim of this study was to evaluate the structural properties of FIM using the Rasch model, with regard to scoring within rehabilitation centres in Scandinavia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: FIM data from 1660 patients with stroke, traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury were analysed. The best models with respect to person separation were determined, together with person reliability, item separation, disordered categories, distance of more than 1.4 logits between categories and item fit to the model. RESULTS: Analysis showed disordering using seven categories in all three diagnoses. After collapsing of categories a four-category scale was the best solution. CONCLUSIONS: Decreasing the categories from seven to four may be one way of dealing with problems of disordered thresholds. Further studies are also needed in order to try the suggested scale in clinical settings and to compare it with the original FIM scale.
Authors: Steven Kirshblum; Amanda Botticello; Daniel P Lammertse; Ralph J Marino; Anthony E Chiodo; Amitabh Jha Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Alvaro I Sánchez; Robert T Krafty; Harold B Weiss; Andrés M Rubiano; Andrew B Peitzman; Juan Carlos Puyana Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2012 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Kim Anderson; Sergio Aito; Michal Atkins; Fin Biering-Sørensen; Susan Charlifue; Armin Curt; John Ditunno; Clive Glass; Ralph Marino; Ruth Marshall; Mary Jane Mulcahey; Marcel Post; Gordana Savic; Giorgio Scivoletto; Amiram Catz Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2008 Impact factor: 1.985