| Literature DB >> 16989969 |
Ke Yu1, Yifei Gong, Zhongying Lin, Yiyu Cheng.
Abstract
Quantitative analysis and chromatographic fingerprinting for the quality evaluation of a Chinese herb Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi using capillary electrophoresis (CE) technique was developed. The separation was performed with a 50.0cm (42.0cm to the detector window)x75mum i.d. fused-silica capillary, and the CE fingerprint condition was optimized using the combination of central composite design and multivariate analysis. The optimized buffer system containing 15mM borate, 40mM phosphate, 15mM SDS, 15% (v/v) acetonitrile and 7.5% (v/v) 2-propanol was employed for the method development, and the baseline separation was achieved within 15min. The determination of the major active components (Baicalin, Baicalein and Wogonin) was carried out using the optimized CE condition. Good linear relationships were provided over the investigated concentration ranges (the values of R(2): 0.9997 for Baicalin, 0.9992 for Baicalein, and 0.9983 for Wogonin, respectively). The average recoveries of these target components ranged between 96.1-105.6%, 98.6-105.2%, and 96.3-105.0%, respectively. CE fingerprints combined with the quantitative analysis can be used for the quality evaluation of S. baicalensis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16989969 PMCID: PMC7125791 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2006.08.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm Biomed Anal ISSN: 0731-7085 Impact factor: 3.935
Fig. 1The chemical structures of Baicalin, Baicalein and Wogonin.
Raw materials investigated in this study
| Sample no. | Origin | Purchasing time | Species |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Chende, Hebei | April 2001 | |
| 02 | Luochuan, Shaanxi | August 2000 | |
| 03 | Weichang, Hebei | April 2001 | |
| 04 | Inner Mongolia | August 2000 | |
| 05 | Inner Mongolia | August 2000 | |
| 06 | Unknown | August 2000 | |
| 07 | Unknown | August 2000 | |
| 08 | Unknown | August 2000 | |
| 09 | Ankang, Shaanxi | June 2001 | |
| 10 | Baishan, Shaanxi | June 2001 | |
| 11 | Anguo, Hebei | May 2001 | |
| 12 | Anguo, Hebei | May 2001 | |
| 13 | Inner Mongolia | August 2000 | |
| 14 | Unknown | April 2001 | |
| 15 | Dingxi, Gansu | May 2001 | |
| 16 | Longxi, Gansu | June 2001 | Unknown |
| 17 | Shanxi | June 2001 | |
| 18 | Baiquan, Henan | July 2001 | |
| 19 | Inner Mongolia | August 2000 | |
| 20 | Unknown | July 2001 | |
| 21 | Inner Mongolia | August 2000 | |
| 22 | Anguo, Hebei | May 2001 | |
| 23 | Lintao, Gansu | May 2001 | |
| 24 | Lintao, Gansu | May 2001 | |
| 25 | Chende, Hebei | December 2000 | |
| 26 | Anguo, Hebei | December 2000 | |
| 27 | Anguo, Hebei | December 2000 | |
| 28 | Juxian, Shandong | December 2000 | |
| 29 | Yishui, Shandong | December 2000 | |
| 30 | Chende, Hebei | December 2000 | |
| 31 | Datong, Shanxi | July 2001 | |
| 32 | Yunan | August 2001 | |
| 33 | Yunan | August 2001 | |
| 34 | Ningxia | August 2001 |
The corresponding samples were not wild.
Experimental factors and levels in the CCD for optimizing CE separation
| Factors | Coded | Levels | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | Central | High | Star point °C (− | Star point °C (+ | ||
| Borate (mM) | 15 | 20 | 25 | 10 | 30 | |
| Phosphate (mM) | 20 | 30 | 40 | 10 | 50 | |
| SDS (mM) | 40 | 60 | 80 | 20 | 100 | |
| Acetonitrile (%, v/v) | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0 | 20 | |
| 2-Propanol (%, v/v) | 2.5 | 5 | 7.5 | 0 | 10 | |
Experimental parameters for CCD and the corresponding responses
| No. | Variables | Responses | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rs1/2 | Rs3/4 | Rs4/5 | Rs5/6 | Rs6/7 | Rs7/8 | ||||||
| 1 | 25.0 | 40.0 | 80.0 | 15.0 | 7.5 | 0.58 | 13.91 | 1.89 | 13.53 | 6.92 | 11.75 |
| 2 | 25.0 | 40.0 | 80.0 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 0.00 | 8.19 | 5.40 | 5.12 | 8.26 | 11.86 |
| 3 | 25.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 15.0 | 2.5 | 0.00 | 2.99 | 10.64 | 4.39 | 2.23 | 8.93 |
| 4 | 25.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 5.0 | 7.5 | 0.00 | 3.80 | 6.81 | 2.58 | 6.23 | 18.54 |
| 5 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 80.0 | 15.0 | 2.5 | 1.39 | 6.67 | 2.02 | 2.73 | 2.08 | 11.05 |
| 6 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 80.0 | 5.0 | 7.5 | 2.43 | 10.85 | 8.70 | 6.68 | 3.27 | 5.04 |
| 7 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 40.0 | 15.0 | 7.5 | 2.17 | 2.07 | 15.27 | 6.48 | 1.23 | 21.32 |
| 8 | 25.0 | 20.0 | 40.0 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 1.23 | 2.39 | 4.30 | 3.12 | 0.80 | 9.83 |
| 9 | 15.0 | 40.0 | 80.0 | 15.0 | 2.5 | 3.60 | 9.42 | 5.06 | 13.27 | 35.49 | 14.76 |
| 10 | 15.0 | 40.0 | 80.0 | 5.0 | 7.5 | 3.36 | 7.90 | 7.90 | 16.51 | 17.71 | 22.20 |
| 11 | 15.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 15.0 | 7.5 | 2.01 | 3.47 | 4.60 | 3.89 | 6.91 | 9.29 |
| 12 | 15.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 2.42 | 5.68 | 0.33 | 5.61 | 32.52 | 0.60 |
| 13 | 15.0 | 20.0 | 80.0 | 15.0 | 7.5 | 0.00 | 9.09 | 4.39 | 3.82 | 1.24 | 3.08 |
| 14 | 15.0 | 20.0 | 80.0 | 5.0 | 2.5 | 0.00 | 5.30 | 5.47 | 4.38 | 5.50 | 10.72 |
| 15 | 15.0 | 20.0 | 40.0 | 15.0 | 2.5 | 0.47 | 2.64 | 5.75 | 2.98 | 1.05 | 6.43 |
| 16 | 15.0 | 20.0 | 40.0 | 5.0 | 7.5 | 0.00 | 1.93 | 3.59 | 1.79 | 0.23 | 7.17 |
| 17 | 30.0 | 30.0 | 60.0 | 10.0 | 5 | 0.90 | 9.60 | 3.29 | 5.58 | 0.39 | 5.90 |
| 18 | 10.0 | 30.0 | 60.0 | 10.0 | 5 | 2.73 | 8.84 | 5.06 | 12.17 | 17.40 | 2.97 |
| 19 | 20.0 | 50.0 | 60.0 | 10.0 | 5 | 3.87 | 14.29 | 9.85 | 17.33 | 26.80 | 13.97 |
| 20 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 60.0 | 10.0 | 5 | 0.96 | 5.71 | 0.57 | 1.42 | 1.18 | 8.31 |
| 21 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 100.0 | 10.0 | 5 | 0.82 | 3.99 | 17.08 | 1.00 | 7.72 | 19.91 |
| 22 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 20.0 | 10.0 | 5 | 0.00 | 2.11 | 7.05 | 3.98 | 1.44 | 11.75 |
| 23 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 60.0 | 20.0 | 5 | 0.00 | 7.97 | 9.98 | 3.88 | 5.25 | 1.31 |
| 24 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 60.0 | 0.0 | 5 | 0.00 | 6.60 | 6.04 | 6.28 | 5.80 | 10.53 |
| 25 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 60.0 | 10.0 | 10 | 0.00 | 10.27 | 2.02 | 5.62 | 0.74 | 5.40 |
| 26 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 60.0 | 10.0 | 0 | 0.00 | 9.19 | 5.93 | 4.01 | 7.99 | 8.73 |
| 27–33 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 60.0 | 10.0 | 5 | 0.00 | 12.69 | 1.61 | 4.59 | 4.39 | 8.98 |
Fig. 2Regression coefficient plots for the resolutions of six critical peak pairs.
Fig. 3Response surface plots of the investigated variables and the resolutions of six critical peak pairs.
Fig. 4Typical CE chromatograms of the standard (A) and real sample solution (B) using the optimized experimental conditions. Buffer system: 15 mM borate, 40 mM phosphate, 40 mM SDS, 15% (v/v) acetonitrile and 7.5% (v/v) 2-propanol. Capillary: 50.0 cm (42.0 cm to the detector window) × 75 μm i.d.; the applied voltage: 20 kV; temperature: 25 °C; detection wavelength: 280 nm; sample injection time 3 s with a 30 mbar pressure.
Regression equations and the detection limits (n = 3)
| Analytes | Regression equation | Correlation coefficient ( | Linear range (mg/L) | Limit of detection (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baicalin | 0.9997 | 20.6–990 | 1.79 | |
| Baicalein | 0.9992 | 20.8–500 | 1.19 | |
| Wogonin | 0.9983 | 12.3–197 | 0.78 |
Determination of three active components in different samples (n = 3)
| Sample no. | Baicalin (mg/g) | Baicalein (mg/g) | Wogonin (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 72.50 | 4.63 | 1.81 |
| 02 | 84.69 | 5.74 | 1.89 |
| 03 | 54.60 | 4.20 | 1.64 |
| 04 | 38.24 | 15.12 | 4.80 |
| 05 | 24.74 | 6.87 | 2.11 |
| 06 | 78.58 | 5.71 | 2.22 |
| 07 | 79.98 | 9.60 | 3.48 |
| 08 | 58.58 | 3.38 | 1.94 |
| 09 | 48.72 | 7.97 | 3.04 |
| 10 | 26.09 | 7.05 | 2.50 |
| 11 | 86.26 | 2.02 | 0.64 |
| 12 | 102.21 | 3.95 | 0.78 |
| 13 | 69.28 | 2.34 | 0.49 |
| 14 | 67.73 | 1.53 | 0.36 |
| 15 | 66.66 | 6.04 | 1.75 |
| 16 | 73.84 | 14.90 | 4.35 |
| 17 | 93.10 | 6.87 | 2.29 |
| 18 | 37.15 | 11.42 | 4.14 |
| 19 | 44.58 | 5.30 | 2.02 |
| 20 | 31.27 | 3.98 | 1.41 |
| 21 | 57.49 | 5.28 | 1.92 |
| 22 | 128.81 | 4.39 | 0.78 |
| 23 | 73.21 | 9.00 | 2.42 |
| 24 | 59.00 | 4.09 | 1.49 |
| 25 | 141.99 | 4.07 | 0.70 |
| 26 | 71.29 | 2.71 | 0.38 |
| 27 | 73.57 | 3.06 | 0.37 |
| 28 | 97.58 | 2.98 | 0.55 |
| 29 | 63.27 | 3.13 | 1.50 |
| 30 | 134.41 | 4.80 | 1.44 |
| 31 | 143.56 | 4.69 | 0.59 |
| 32 | 112.03 | 7.80 | 0.94 |
| 33 | 106.93 | 8.09 | 0.72 |
| 34 | 70.56 | 6.97 | 1.40 |
The similarity of the samples investigated
| Origin of the samples | Similarity of the chromatographic fingerprint | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inner Mongolia | Gansu | Hebei | Shaanxi | Shandong | Yunnan | |
| Inner Mongolia | 0.9544 | 0.9875 | 0.8777 | 0.9659 | 0.9878 | 0.8987 |
| Inner Mongolia | 0.9933 | 0.9831 | 0.7993 | 0.9166 | 0.9472 | 0.8241 |
| Inner Mongolia | 0.9223 | 0.8530 | 0.5868 | 0.7269 | 0.7449 | 0.6297 |
| Inner Mongolia | 0.9855 | 0.9150 | 0.6689 | 0.8061 | 0.8464 | 0.7017 |
| Dingxi, Gansu | 0.9710 | 0.9978 | 0.8622 | 0.9606 | 0.9800 | 0.8901 |
| Longxi, Gansu | 0.9311 | 0.9857 | 0.8855 | 0.9686 | 0.9631 | 0.9166 |
| Lintao, Gansu | 0.9460 | 0.9968 | 0.8978 | 0.9796 | 0.9870 | 0.9244 |
| Lintao, Gansu | 0.9890 | 0.9841 | 0.8075 | 0.9225 | 0.9537 | 0.8363 |
| Anguo, Hebei | 0.8799 | 0.9602 | 0.9581 | 0.9950 | 0.9962 | 0.9593 |
| Anguo, Hebei | 0.8117 | 0.9179 | 0.9918 | 0.9879 | 0.9714 | 0.9859 |
| Chengde, Hebei | 0.6516 | 0.7789 | 0.9804 | 0.8973 | 0.8586 | 0.9545 |
| Chengde, Hebei | 0.6804 | 0.8067 | 0.9897 | 0.9192 | 0.8823 | 0.9676 |
| Luochuan, Shaanxi | 0.8986 | 0.9754 | 0.9493 | 0.9987 | 0.9964 | 0.9623 |
| Shaanxi | 0.8604 | 0.9543 | 0.9732 | 0.9988 | 0.9871 | 0.9811 |
| Juxian, Shandong | 0.8311 | 0.9307 | 0.9845 | 0.9923 | 0.9806 | 0.9803 |
| Yishui, Shandong | 0.9726 | 0.9880 | 0.8401 | 0.9428 | 0.9710 | 0.8676 |
| Yunnan | 0.7706 | 0.8888 | 0.9859 | 0.9677 | 0.9406 | 0.9997 |
| Yunnan | 0.7940 | 0.9076 | 0.9847 | 0.9780 | 0.9545 | 0.9997 |