Literature DB >> 16985461

Pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum: prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases.

Yongjung J Kim1, Keith H Bridwell, Lawrence G Lenke, Seungchul Rhim, Gene Cheh.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the incidence of and risk factors for pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal instrumentation and fusion to S1. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies on pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal instrumentation and fusion to S1 exist.
METHODS: A clinical and radiographic assessment of 144 adult patients with spinal deformity (average age 52.0 years; range 21.1-77.6) who underwent long (5-17 vertebrae, average 11.9) spinal instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum at a single institution between 1985 and 2002, with a minimum 2-year follow-up (average 3.9; range 2-14) was performed.
RESULTS: Of 144 patients, 34 (24%) had pseudarthroses. There were 17 patients who had pseudarthroses at T10-L2 and 15 at L5-S1. A total of 24 patients (71%) presented with multiple levels involved (2-6). Pseudarthrosis was most commonly detected within 4 years postoperatively (31 patients; 94%). Factors that statistically increased the risk of pseudarthrosis were: thoracolumbar kyphosis (T10-L2 > or = 20 degrees vs. < 20 degrees, P < 0.0001); osteoarthritis of the hip joint (P = 0.002); thoracoabdominal approach (vs. paramedian approach, P = 0.009); positive sagittal balance > or = 5 cm at 8 weeks postoperatively (vs. < or = 5 cm, P = 0.012); age at surgery older than 55 years (vs. 55 years or younger, P = 0.019); and incomplete sacropelvic fixation (vs. complete sacropelvic fixation, P = 0.020). Fusion from upper thoracic spine (T2-T5) did not statistically increase the pseudarthrosis rate compared to lower thoracic spine (T9-T12) (P = 0.20). Patients with pseudarthrosis had significantly lower Scoliosis Research Society 24 outcome scores (average score 71/120) than those without (average score 90/120; P < 0.0001) at ultimate follow-up.
CONCLUSION: The overall prevalence of pseudarthrosis following long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to S1 was 24%. Thoracolumbar kyphosis, osteoarthritis of the hip joint, thoracoabdominal approach (vs. paramedian approach), positive sagittal balance > or = 5 cm at 8 weeks postoperatively, older age at surgery (older than 55 years), and incomplete sacropelvic fixation significantly increased the risks of pseudarthrosis to an extent that was statistically significant. Scoliosis Research Society 24 outcomes scores at ultimate follow-up were adversely affected when pseudarthrosis developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16985461     DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000238968.82799.d9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  86 in total

1.  Spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson's disease: experiences with the challenges posed by sagittal imbalance and the Parkinson's spine.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Frank Acosta; Juliane Zenner; Luis Ferraris; Wolfgang Hitzl; Oliver Meier; Steven Ondra; Tyler Koski; Rene Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Clinical incidence of sacroiliac joint arthritis and pain after sacropelvic fixation for spinal deformity.

Authors:  Seiji Ohtori; Takeshi Sainoh; Masashi Takaso; Gen Inoue; Sumihisa Orita; Yawara Eguchi; Junichi Nakamura; Yasuchika Aoki; Tetsuhiro Ishikawa; Masayuki Miyagi; Gen Arai; Hiroto Kamoda; Miyako Suzuki; Gou Kubota; Yoshihiro Sakuma; Yasuhiro Oikawa; Masashi Yamazaki; Tomoaki Toyone; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.759

3.  Mesenchymal stem cells derived from vertebrae (vMSCs) show best biological properties.

Authors:  Giovanni Barbanti Brodano; Silvia Terzi; Luisa Trombi; Cristiana Griffoni; Mauro Valtieri; Stefano Boriani; Maria Cristina Magli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Risk factors for medical complications after long-level internal fixation in the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis.

Authors:  Xi-Nuo Zhang; Xiang-Yao Sun; Xiang-Long Meng; Yong Hai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Stem cells for spine surgery.

Authors:  Joshua Schroeder; Janina Kueper; Kaplan Leon; Meir Liebergall
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.326

6.  Evaluation of iliac screw, S2 alar-iliac screw and laterally placed triangular titanium implants for sacropelvic fixation in combination with posterior lumbar instrumentation: a finite element study.

Authors:  Gloria Casaroli; Fabio Galbusera; Ruchi Chande; Derek Lindsey; Ali Mesiwala; Scott Yerby; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Robotic versus freehand S2 alar iliac fixation: in-depth technical considerations.

Authors:  Joseph L Laratta; Jamal N Shillingford; Joshua S Meredith; Lawrence G Lenke; Ronald A Lehman; Jeffrey L Gum
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-09

8.  Let'X-STOP with any "distraction" from the true problem: scenarios in which minimally invasive surgery is not welcome!

Authors:  Tobias A Mattei
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Conny Pfanz; Oliver Meier; Wolfgang Hitzl; Michael Mayer; Viola Bullmann; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Factors affecting clinical results after corrective osteotomy for lumbar degenerative kyphosis.

Authors:  Whoan Jeang Kim; Jong Won Kang; Sung Il Kang; Hwan Il Sung; Kun Young Park; Jae Guk Park; Won Cho Kwon; Won Sik Choy
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2010-04-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.