Literature DB >> 16985358

The human face of simulation: patient-focused simulation training.

Roger Kneebone1, Debra Nestel, Cordula Wetzel, Steven Black, Ros Jacklin, Raj Aggarwal, Faranak Yadollahi, John Wolfe, Charles Vincent, Ara Darzi.   

Abstract

Simulation is firmly established within health care training but often focuses on training for technical tasks and can overlook crucial skills such as professionalism and physician-patient communication. The authors locate this paper within current developments in health care and relate it to the literature on simulation. They make the case for placing real human "patients" (played by actors) within simulation environments, thereby ensuring that the training experience remains rooted in actual practice. By practicing repeatedly within a safe environment, technical skills, communication with patients and team members, decision making, and clinical judgment may all be practiced and mastered while preserving patient safety. In elaborating this concept of patient-focused simulation (PFS), the authors draw on work already published by their group and several recent studies that are in review. These explore PFS in low, medium, and high complexity settings. Important or rare situations can be recreated and practiced, as well as key procedures required across a range of experience levels and clinical specialties. Finally, the case is made for curriculum redesign to ensure that simulator-based technical skills training and assessment take place within an authentic context that reflects the wider elements of clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16985358     DOI: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000238323.73623.c2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  35 in total

Review 1.  Simulation in surgical education.

Authors:  Vanessa N Palter; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Medical student self-efficacy with family-centered care during bedside rounds.

Authors:  Henry N Young; Jayna B Schumacher; Megan A Moreno; Roger L Brown; Ted D Sigrest; Gwen K McIntosh; Daniel J Schumacher; Michelle M Kelly; Elizabeth D Cox
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.893

3.  The role and validity of surgical simulation.

Authors:  Riaz A Agha; Alexander J Fowler
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-02

4.  Lessons for surgeons in the final moments of Air France Flight 447.

Authors:  Aneel Bhangu; Sonia Bhangu; James Stevenson; Douglas M Bowley
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  The validity of surgical simulation.

Authors:  Riaz A Agha; Alexander J Fowler
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  LLETZ Specimen Fragmentation: Impact on Diagnosis, Outcome, and Implications for Training.

Authors:  Rasiah Bharathan; Balvinder Sagoo; Aravind Subramaniam; Peter Larsen-Disney; Andrew Fish
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-03-26

Review 7.  Role of simulation in training the next generation of endoscopists.

Authors:  Simon C Blackburn; Stephen J Griffin
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2014-06-16

8.  Hybrid simulation for knee arthrocentesis: improving fidelity in procedures training.

Authors:  Lynfa Stroud; Rodrigo B Cavalcanti
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  High-fidelity simulation as an experiential model for teaching root cause analysis.

Authors:  Sadeq A Quraishi; Stephen J Kimatian; W Bosseau Murray; Elizabeth H Sinz
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-12

Review 10.  Validation and implementation of surgical simulators: a critical review of present, past, and future.

Authors:  B M A Schout; A J M Hendrikx; F Scheele; B L H Bemelmans; A J J A Scherpbier
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.