Literature DB >> 16985108

Hydro-MRI of the small bowel: effect of contrast volume, timing of contrast administration, and data acquisition on bowel distention.

Christiane A Kuehle1, Waleed Ajaj, Susanne C Ladd, Sandra Massing, Joerg Barkhausen, Thomas C Lauenstein.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess oral contrast agents, volumes of the agents, and time points of data acquisition in regard to small-bowel distention and patient acceptance. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Six healthy volunteers underwent imaging on 16 different days. Four volumes (450, 900, 1,350, and 1,800 mL) of each of the four contrast compounds (0.2% locust bean gum plus 2.5% mannitol, VoLumen containing 2.0% sorbitol, VoLumen containing 1.4% sorbitol, and tap water) were used. Two-dimensional true fast imaging with steady-state free precession data sets were acquired at 5-minute intervals after contrast ingestion. Distention values for small-bowel segments (duodenum, proximal and distal jejunum, ileum) and occurrence of side effects were documented.
RESULTS: Analysis of bowel distention revealed significantly greater distention for all carbohydrate sugar alcohol-containing solutions compared with water but no significant difference among the three contrast agents. Sufficient duodenal distention was achieved with 900 mL of any of the contrast agents, but imaging had to be performed soon after ingestion. For MRI of the distal jejunum and ileum, a volume of 1,350 mL is preferable, and the time point of data acquisition plays a minor role. Ingestion of 1,800 mL of the carbohydrate sugar alcohol solutions led to a significantly higher rate of side effects such as abdominal cramps than did ingestion of smaller volumes.
CONCLUSION: The data indicate that sufficient contrast consumption and optimal timing of data acquisition are essential to distention of the small bowel. Oral contrast agent protocols should be adapted to the bowel region in question.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16985108     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.1079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  30 in total

1.  Enterclysis versus enterography: the unsettled issue.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Updating magnetic resonance imaging of small bowel: imaging protocols and clinical indications.

Authors:  Jiong Zhu; Jian-Rong Xu; Hong-Xia Gong; Yan Zhou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Computed tomography enterography and magnetic resonance enterography: the future of small bowel imaging.

Authors:  Mark E Baker; David M Einstein; Joseph C Veniero
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-08

Review 4.  An overview of magnetic resonance enterography for Crohn's disease.

Authors:  Suresh Pola; Cynthia Santillan; Barrett G Levesque; Brian G Feagan; William J Sandborn
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Current best practice for disease activity assessment in IBD.

Authors:  Alissa J Walsh; Robert V Bryant; Simon P L Travis
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 46.802

6.  Comparison of three oral contrast preparations for magnetic resonance enterography in pediatric patients with known or suspected Crohn disease: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Ravi V Gottumukkala; Annette LaPointe; Donna Sargent; Michael S Gee
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-03-09

7.  Small bowel MRI enteroclysis or follow through: which is optimal?

Authors:  Ian C Lawrance; Christopher J Welman; Peter Shipman; Kevin Murray
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Gastrointestinal imaging-practical magnetic resonance imaging approach.

Authors:  Baodong Liu; Miguel Ramalho; Mamdoh AlObaidy; Kiran K Busireddy; Ersan Altun; Janaka Kalubowila; Richard C Semelka
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-08-28

9.  Extensive lipomatosis of the small bowel and mesentery: CT and MRI findings.

Authors:  Takanobu Komagata; Shigeo Takebayashi; Kingo Hirasawa; Takuma Fukawa; Mito Arai
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-11-26

10.  Value of cine MRI for better visualization of the proximal small bowel in normal individuals.

Authors:  Michael R Torkzad; Roberto Vargas; Chikako Tanaka; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.