Literature DB >> 16984898

Influence of atazanavir 200 mg on the intracellular and plasma pharmacokinetics of saquinavir and ritonavir 1600/100 mg administered once daily in HIV-infected patients.

Jennifer Ford1, Marta Boffito, Desmond Maitland, Andrew Hill, David Back, Saye Khoo, Mark Nelson, Graeme Moyle, Brian Gazzard, Anton Pozniak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine cellular and plasma concentrations of atazanavir when given in combination with saquinavir/ritonavir in HIV+ patients.
METHODS: Twelve HIV+ patients were receiving saquinavir/atazanavir/ritonavir 1600/200/100 mg once daily and venous blood samples were taken to determine cellular and plasma concentrations of each protease inhibitor at 2, 6, 12 and 24 h. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were separated by density gradient centrifugation. The ratio of the cellular AUC0-24/plasma AUC0-24 was calculated to determine cellular drug accumulation. Lymphocyte P-glycoprotein (P-gp), breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and multidrug resistance-associated protein (MRP1) expression was determined by flow cytometry. Nine of the patients had previously received a regimen of saquinavir/ritonavir 1600/100 mg; therefore the effect of atazanavir on the cellular and plasma pharmacokinetics of saquinavir and ritonavir was examined.
RESULTS: In vivo cellular and plasma determinations of saquinavir, atazanavir and ritonavir gave accumulation ratios of 4.9, 1.2 and 1.7, respectively. There was no relationship between saquinavir, atazanavir or ritonavir accumulation and P-gp, MRP1 or BCRP expression. When comparing pharmacokinetic values in the nine patients receiving saquinavir/ritonavir with and without atazanavir, the median cellular saquinavir AUC0-24 was significantly increased (34.9-117.2 mg.h/L) on addition of atazanavir (P=0.004). The C24 of saquinavir in plasma and cells was significantly higher with atazanavir (plasma C24 0.05 versus 0.14 mg/L with atazanavir; cellular C24 0.61 versus 2.03 mg/L with atazanavir, P=0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: The mechanism of differential intracellular protease inhibitor accumulation is unclear. Co-administration of atazanavir caused an increase in both the plasma and cellular exposure (AUC0-24) and C24 of saquinavir but not ritonavir.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16984898     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkl379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  10 in total

Review 1.  Influence of drug transport proteins on the pharmacokinetics and drug interactions of HIV protease inhibitors.

Authors:  Latoya Griffin; Pieter Annaert; Kim L R Brouwer
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  A rapid spin through oil results in higher cell-associated concentrations of antiretrovirals compared with conventional cell washing.

Authors:  Theodore J Cory; Lee C Winchester; Brian L Robbins; Courtney V Fletcher
Journal:  Bioanalysis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.681

Review 3.  Intracellular Pharmacokinetics of Antiretroviral Drugs in HIV-Infected Patients, and their Correlation with Drug Action.

Authors:  Caroline Bazzoli; Vincent Jullien; Clotilde Le Tiec; Elisabeth Rey; France Mentré; Anne-Marie Taburet
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Ultra-fast analysis of plasma and intracellular levels of HIV protease inhibitors in children: a clinical application of MALDI mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Jeroen J A van Kampen; Mariska L Reedijk; Peter C Burgers; Lennard J M Dekker; Nico G Hartwig; Ineke E van der Ende; Ronald de Groot; Albert D M E Osterhaus; David M Burger; Theo M Luider; Rob A Gruters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Atazanavir: a review of its use in the management of HIV-1 infection.

Authors:  Katherine F Croom; Sohita Dhillon; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Coadministration of atazanavir-ritonavir and zinc sulfate: impact on hyperbilirubinemia and pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Graeme Moyle; Laura Else; Akil Jackson; David Back; Manisha H Yapa; Natalia Seymour; Lisa Ringner-Nackter; Zeenat Karolia; Brian Gazzard; Marta Boffito
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Pharmacokinetic Changes during Pregnancy According to Genetic Variants: a Prospective Study in HIV-Infected Patients Receiving Atazanavir-Ritonavir.

Authors:  Emanuele Focà; Andrea Calcagno; Andrea Bonito; Jessica Cusato; Elisabetta Domenighini; Antonio D'Avolio; Eugenia Quiros Roldan; Laura Trentini; Filippo Castelnuovo; Giovanni Di Perri; Francesco Castelli; Stefano Bonora
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Association of a single-nucleotide polymorphism in the pregnane X receptor (PXR 63396C-->T) with reduced concentrations of unboosted atazanavir.

Authors:  Marco Siccardi; Antonio D'Avolio; Lorena Baietto; Sara Gibbons; Mauro Sciandra; Daniela Colucci; Stefano Bonora; Saye Khoo; David J Back; Giovanni Di Perri; Andrew Owen
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Cytochrome P450 3A inhibition by atazanavir and ritonavir, but not demography or drug formulation, influences saquinavir population pharmacokinetics in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected adults.

Authors:  Nils von Hentig; Jörn Lötsch
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Plasma and intracellular pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir once daily and raltegravir once and twice daily in HIV-infected individuals.

Authors:  Akil Jackson; Victoria Watson; David Back; Saye Khoo; Neill Liptrott; Deidre Egan; Keerti Gedela; Chris Higgs; Riaz Abbas; Brian Gazzard; Marta Boffito
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.731

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.