Literature DB >> 16984515

Comparative study of induction of labor in nulliparous women with premature rupture of membranes at term compared to those with intact membranes: duration of labor and mode of delivery.

Kyo Hoon Park1, Joon-Seok Hong, Ji Kyung Ko, Yong Kyoon Cho, Chul Min Lee, Hoon Choi, Bok Rin Kim.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the effect of premature rupture of membranes (PROM) at term on the duration of labor and mode of delivery in comparison with intact membranes in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix whose labor was induced.
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all term nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix requiring labor induction over a 2-year period. Prostaglandin E(2) (dinoprostone) and oxytocin were used for labor induction. Criteria for enrolment included (i) singleton pregnancy; (ii) term nulliparous women; or (iii) Bishop score below 6. Statistics were analyzed with Student's t-test, chi(2)-test, Fisher's exact test, and multiple logistic regression.
RESULTS: Our study subjects were 82 women whose labor was induced for PROM and 219 women with intact membranes whose labor was induced for social or fetal reasons. The mean durations of active phase of labor were not significantly different between women with PROM and those with intact membranes. However, the women with PROM had a significantly longer mean duration of second stage and a higher rate of cesarean delivery for failure to progress than those with intact membranes. Multiple logistic regression demonstrated that only PROM and fetal macrosomia were significantly associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery for failure to progress after other confounding variables were adjusted.
CONCLUSIONS: Labor induction for PROM at term in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix is associated with longer duration of the second stage and a higher risk of cesarean delivery for failure to progress in comparison to those with intact membranes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16984515     DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00443.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  6 in total

1.  The risk factors for failure of labor induction: a cohort study.

Authors:  Emilio Giugliano; Elisa Cagnazzo; Viviana Milillo; Massimo Moscarini; Fortunato Vesce; Donatella Caserta; Roberto Marci
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-12-01

2.  Risk of cesarean section after induced versus spontaneous labor at term gestation.

Authors:  Hye Ran Lee; Mi-Na Kim; Ji Yeon You; Suk-Joo Choi; Soo-Young Oh; Cheong-Rae Roh; Jong-Hwa Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2015-09-22

3.  "Early rupture of membranes" during induced labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery in term nulliparas.

Authors:  Seung Mi Lee; Jeong Woo Park; Chan-Wook Park; Bo Hyun Yoon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Prevalence and factors associated with failed induction of labor in Worabe Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Southern Ethiopia.

Authors:  Muhdin Mohammed; Rewda Oumer; Fatuma Mohammed; Fantahun Walle; Hassen Mosa; Ritbano Ahmed; Shamill Eanga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Inconsistency Between Women's Preference and Actual Mode of Delivery in China: Findings From a Prospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jing Wu; Li Feng; Hongwei Zhang; Li Guo; Rafael Pérez-Escamilla; Yifei Hu
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-03-30

6.  Effect of Premature Rupture of Membranes on Induction of Labor: A Historical Cohort Study.

Authors:  Sven Kehl; Christel Weiss; Ulf Dammer; Friederike Baier; Florian Faschingbauer; Matthias W Beckmann; Marc Sütterlin; Jutta Pretscher
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.915

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.