AIM: Recombinant human thyrotropin (rhTSH) is a new option for diagnostic follow-up in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Iodine kinetics after administration of rhTSH is controversially discussed. The aim of our study was to compare the time course of radioiodine in tumour and normal tissue during periods of TSH elevation in patients in a hypothyroid state (HS) following hormone withdrawal, with those under euthyroidism (ES) after the administration of rhTSH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated four patients who had undergone near-total thyroidectomy and were suffering from metastatic disease. Dosimetric calculations were performed using tumour and whole-body uptake, and background measurements from 123-iodine scans performed 0, 4, 24 and 48 h after the application of (123)I. RESULTS: All patients had lesser uptake of (123)I under rhTSH stimulation than after hormone withdrawal. The median maximum TG (thyroglobulin) levels were 733.1 ng/ml with HS and 548.0 ng/ml with ES. The median half-life in tumour tissue was 39.8 h (mean 65.9, range 11.5-194.0) with HS and 21.9 h (mean 38.7, range. 8.7-113.9) with ES. The median uptake dose in per cent in tumour tissue was 0.08 (mean 0.15, range 0.04-0.6) with HS and 0.05 (mean 0.08, range 0.03-0.2) with ES. Furthermore, the cumulative activity in metastatic tissue was lower after rhTSH than during hypothyroidism, with considerable variations between individual lesions. CONCLUSION: In our small group of DTC patients with metastatic disease, the effectiveness of radioiodine therapy following rhTSH was anticipated to be less than that in individuals who were hypothyroid after levothyroxine (L-T(4)) withdrawal. Endogenous TSH stimulation of metastatic thyroid cancer with radioiodine should not be performed without prior target tumour lesion dosimetry with (123)I.
AIM: Recombinant human thyrotropin (rhTSH) is a new option for diagnostic follow-up in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Iodine kinetics after administration of rhTSH is controversially discussed. The aim of our study was to compare the time course of radioiodine in tumour and normal tissue during periods of TSH elevation in patients in a hypothyroid state (HS) following hormone withdrawal, with those under euthyroidism (ES) after the administration of rhTSH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We investigated four patients who had undergone near-total thyroidectomy and were suffering from metastatic disease. Dosimetric calculations were performed using tumour and whole-body uptake, and background measurements from 123-iodine scans performed 0, 4, 24 and 48 h after the application of (123)I. RESULTS: All patients had lesser uptake of (123)I under rhTSH stimulation than after hormone withdrawal. The median maximum TG (thyroglobulin) levels were 733.1 ng/ml with HS and 548.0 ng/ml with ES. The median half-life in tumour tissue was 39.8 h (mean 65.9, range 11.5-194.0) with HS and 21.9 h (mean 38.7, range. 8.7-113.9) with ES. The median uptake dose in per cent in tumour tissue was 0.08 (mean 0.15, range 0.04-0.6) with HS and 0.05 (mean 0.08, range 0.03-0.2) with ES. Furthermore, the cumulative activity in metastatic tissue was lower after rhTSH than during hypothyroidism, with considerable variations between individual lesions. CONCLUSION: In our small group of DTC patients with metastatic disease, the effectiveness of radioiodine therapy following rhTSH was anticipated to be less than that in individuals who were hypothyroid after levothyroxine (L-T(4)) withdrawal. Endogenous TSH stimulation of metastatic thyroid cancer with radioiodine should not be performed without prior target tumour lesion dosimetry with (123)I.
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: F Pacini; F Basolo; R Bellantone; G Boni; M A Cannizzaro; M De Palma; C Durante; R Elisei; G Fadda; A Frasoldati; L Fugazzola; R Guglielmi; C P Lombardi; P Miccoli; E Papini; G Pellegriti; L Pezzullo; A Pontecorvi; M Salvatori; E Seregni; P Vitti Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2018-05-04 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Donika Plyku; Robert F Hobbs; Kevin Huang; Frank Atkins; Carlos Garcia; George Sgouros; Douglas Van Nostrand Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Yu-Yu Liu; Michael P Brandt; Daniel H Shen; Richard T Kloos; Xiaoli Zhang; Sissy M Jhiang Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; David S Cooper; Charles H Emerson; Markus Luster; Rui M B Maciel; Rosa P M Biscolla; Ernest L Mazzaferri; Geraldo Medeiros-Neto; Christoph Reiners; Richard J Robbins; Bruce G Robinson; Martin Schlumberger; Shunichi Yamashita; Furio Pacini Journal: Thyroid Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 6.568