Literature DB >> 16984063

Women's preferences for cervical cancer screening: a study using a discrete choice experiment.

Sarah Wordsworth1, Mandy Ryan, Diane Skåtun, Norman Waugh.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Recent policy recommendations for cervical screening include liquid-based cytology. This new approach could improve laboratory throughput, reducing the waiting time for test results. New guidelines also standardize the interval for screening, with women aged 25-50 offered screening every 3 years and women aged 50-64 every 5 years. Quantitative evidence on the preferences of women for alternative screening programs is limited; this study, therefore, elicits such preferences.
METHODS: A postal questionnaire using a discrete choice experiment was mailed to 2,000 women in the Tayside Health Board region of Scotland.
RESULTS: A response rate of 44 percent from those women who had previously had a smear was achieved. Women had a significant positive preference for reductions in recall rates and waiting time for results. Women preferred more frequent screening, particularly those aged 50+. Expected reductions in the chance of recall from the conventional Pap smear to the new liquid-based cytology were associated with a willingness to pay of pound 41. Women aged 50+ would be willing to pay pound 42 to increase the frequency of screening from every 5 to every 3 years. Service characteristics did not influence screening participation.
CONCLUSIONS: Guidance to move to liquid-based cytology will meet women's preferences for fewer repeat cervical smears and should reduce waiting time for results. However, proposals to increase screening intervals for those aged 50+ are inconsistent with the preferences for this age group. From a policy perspective, our study results suggest that the changes in attributes of the service such as unsatisfactory smear rates and frequency of screening, will improve service efficiency without affecting participation rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16984063     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462306051245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  11 in total

1.  Effects of simplifying choice tasks on estimates of taste heterogeneity in stated-choice surveys.

Authors:  F Reed Johnson; Semra Ozdemir; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Numeracy and Understanding of Quantitative Aspects of Predictive Models: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Gary E Weissman; Kuldeep N Yadav; Vanessa Madden; Katherine R Courtright; Joanna L Hart; David A Asch; Marilyn M Schapira; Scott D Halpern
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Enhancing participation to health screening campaigns by group interactions.

Authors:  Raffaella Burioni; Pierluigi Contucci; Micaela Fedele; Cecilia Vernia; Alessandro Vezzani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Stated Preference for Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review of the Literature, 1990-2013.

Authors:  Carol Mansfield; Florence K L Tangka; Donatus U Ekwueme; Judith Lee Smith; Gery P Guy; Chunyu Li; A Brett Hauber
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.830

5.  Patients' Preferences for Genomic Diagnostic Testing in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  James Buchanan; Sarah Wordsworth; Anna Schuh
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Social inequalities in cervical cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment among French general practitioners and gynaecologists.

Authors:  Thibaut Raginel; Guillaume Grandazzi; Guy Launoy; Mélanie Trocmé; Véronique Christophe; Célia Berchi; Lydia Guittet
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Personal utility and genomic information: look before you leap.

Authors:  Scott D Grosse; Colleen M McBride; James P Evans; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  What determines patient preferences for treating low risk basal cell carcinoma when comparing surgery vs imiquimod? A discrete choice experiment survey from the SINS trial.

Authors:  Michela Tinelli; Mara Ozolins; Fiona Bath-Hextall; Hywel C Williams
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2012-10-04

9.  Men's preferences for prostate cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  E W de Bekker-Grob; J M Rose; B Donkers; M-L Essink-Bot; C H Bangma; E W Steyerberg
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Protective Behaviour of Citizens to Transport Accidents Involving Hazardous Materials: A Discrete Choice Experiment Applied to Populated Areas nearby Waterways.

Authors:  Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Arnold D Bergstra; Michiel C J Bliemer; Inge J M Trijssenaar-Buhre; Alex Burdorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.