Literature DB >> 16983689

Outcome of craniofacial resection in patients 70 years of age and older.

Ian Ganly1, Neil D Gross, Snehal G Patel, Mark H Bilsky, Jatin P Shah, Dennis H Kraus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Craniofacial resection (CFR) for patients over 70 years of age is uncommon. This study examines a cohort of 36 patients who had CFR at a single institution with the aim of reporting mortality, complications, and outcome.
METHODS: Thirty-six patients 70 years of age and older were identified from a prospective database of 234 patients who had CFR at a single institution. The median age was 72 years (range, 70-87). Seventeen (47%) patients had had prior single-modality or combined treatment, which included surgery in 14 (40%), radiation in 13 (36%), and chemotherapy in 2 (6%). Thirty-five patients had a malignant tumor and 1 patient a benign tumor; 15 (42%) had high-grade, 17 (47%) intermediate-grade, and 4 (11%) low-grade pathology. The margins of resection were close or microscopically positive in 18 (50%). Adjuvant radiotherapy was given in 15 (42%) and chemotherapy in 1 (3%). Complications were classified into overall, local, central nervous system (CNS), systemic, and orbital. Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Outcomes were compared with patients less than 70 years of age.
RESULTS: Postoperative mortality occurred in 6 (17%) patients and postoperative complications occurred in 23 (64%) patients. Local wound complications occurred in 11 (30%), CNS in 12 (33%), systemic in 6 (17%), and orbital in 1 (3%). Postoperative mortality and complications were significantly higher in patients 70 years of age and older compared with patients less than 70 years of age (17% versus 1.5%, p = .0005; 64% versus 36%, p = .003, respectively). With a median follow-up of 27 months (range, 1-237), the 3 year OS and DSS were significantly poorer than patients less than 70 years of age (OS: 53% versus 69%, p = .0004; DSS: 61% versus 70%, p = .01) due to increased medical comorbidity (53% versus 24%, p = .001) and poorer histology (high-, intermediate-, low-grade histology: 42%, 47%, 11% versus 26%, 47%, 27%, p = .05, respectively) in patients over 70 years of age.
CONCLUSION: CFR in patients 70 years of age and older is associated with increased mortality, increased incidence of complications, and a poorer overall and disease-specific 3-year survival, compared with patients less than 70 years of age. The survival was likely due to increased medical comorbidity and adverse histology. These factors must be taken into account when considering an elderly patient for craniofacial resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 16983689     DOI: 10.1002/hed.20487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  10 in total

1.  Impact of Dural Resection on Sinonasal Malignancies with Skull Base Encroachment or Erosion.

Authors:  Hedyeh Ziai; Eugene Yu; Terence Fu; Nidal Muhanna; Eric Monteiro; Allan Vescan; Gelareh Zadeh; Ian J Witterick; David P Goldstein; Fred Gentili; John R de Almeida
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2017-12-29

2.  Outcomes of Craniofacial Open Surgery in Octogenarians.

Authors:  Barak Ringel; Narin N Carmel-Neiderman; Daniel Ben-Ner; Aviyah Pery; Ahmad Safadi; Avraham Abergel; Nevo Margalit; Dan M Fliss
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-03-09

3.  Outcomes of Open vs Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery in Patients 70 Years or Older.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Stephenson; Saangyoung Eric Lee; Katherine Adams; Douglas R Farquhar; Zainab Farzal; Charles S Ebert; Matthew Ewend; Deanna Sasaki-Adams; Brian D Thorp; Adam M Zanation
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Neuro-navigation: An Adjunct in Craniofacial Surgeries: Our Experience.

Authors:  Harsha Chauhan; S Girish Rao; B A Chandramurli; S Sampath
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-05-17

5.  Endoscopic resection of malignant sinonasal tumours: current trends and imaging workup.

Authors:  A A Dmytriw; I J Witterick; E Yu
Journal:  OA Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2013-09-19

6.  Outcome after pharyngeal reconstruction using pectoralis major and radial forearm flap after resection of pharyngeal and laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Andreas Knopf; Naglaa Mansour; Benedikt Hofauer; Henning Bier; Elias Q Scherer
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Carbon ion therapy for advanced sinonasal malignancies: feasibility and acute toxicity.

Authors:  Alexandra D Jensen; Anna V Nikoghosyan; Swantje Ecker; Malte Ellerbrock; Jürgen Debus; Marc W Münter
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Safety of Immediate Posterior Trunk Soft-Tissue Reconstruction in Older Adults.

Authors:  Nicholas A Calotta; Devin Coon; Justin M Sacks
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-05-25

9.  Treatment Outcome of 227 Patients with Sinonasal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma (ACC) after Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy and Active Raster-Scanning Carbon Ion Boost: A 10-Year Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Sati Akbaba; Dina Ahmed; Andreas Mock; Thomas Held; Suzan Bahadir; Kristin Lang; Mustafa Syed; Juliane Hoerner-Rieber; Tobias Forster; Philippe Federspil; Klaus Herfarth; Peter Plinkert; Juergen Debus; Sebastian Adeberg
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Perioperative mortality of head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Yannan Wang; Mengxue Wang; Yan Tang; Bincan Sun; Kai Wang; Feiya Zhu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.