Literature DB >> 30210968

Impact of Dural Resection on Sinonasal Malignancies with Skull Base Encroachment or Erosion.

Hedyeh Ziai1, Eugene Yu2, Terence Fu3, Nidal Muhanna4, Eric Monteiro4, Allan Vescan4, Gelareh Zadeh5, Ian J Witterick4, David P Goldstein4, Fred Gentili5, John R de Almeida4.   

Abstract

Objectives  (1) To determine the occult rate of dural invasion in patients with tumors extending to and/or eroding the bony anterior skull base but without evidence of dural invasion on preoperative imaging. (2) To determine the impact of dural resection and of skull base erosion on survival outcomes in this group of patients (without evidence of dural invasion upon preoperative imaging). Study Design  Retrospective study. Setting  Tertiary care academic center. ParticipantsPatients with sinonasal malignancies with anterior skull base encroachment/erosion without dural invasion on preoperative imaging treated surgically. Main Outcome Measures  (1) Histopathologic disease in the dura in patients who had dural resection and (2) Oncologic outcomes (5-year local recurrence, dural recurrence, disease-specific survival, and overall survival) in patients with and without dural resection, and patients with and without skull base erosion. Results  Thirty-seven patients were included. The occult rate of dural invasion was 54%. Patients with dural resection had improved margin control versus those without dural resection (90% vs 56%, p  = 0.02). Dural resection improved 5-year overall survival only in patients with esthesioneuroblastoma compared with bony skull base resection alone (100% vs 75%, p  = 0.03). Patients with skull base erosion had reduced local control versus those without erosion (63% vs 93%, p  = 0.047). Conclusion  This study suggests a substantial rate of occult dural invasion despite no overt imaging findings. Dural resection may be associated with improved margin control, but no oncologic benefit except for esthesioneuroblastomas, although treatment heterogeneity and small sample size may limit conclusions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  nose and paranasal sinuses (head and neck); radiology; skull base (head and neck); survival

Year:  2017        PMID: 30210968      PMCID: PMC6133664          DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1612617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base        ISSN: 2193-634X


  34 in total

1.  Use of preoperative MR to predict dural, perineural, and venous sinus invasion of skull base tumors.

Authors:  M D Eisen; D M Yousem; K T Montone; M J Kotapka; D C Bigelow; W B Bilker; L A Loevner
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Complications of anterior craniofacial resection.

Authors:  F L Dias; G M Sá; J Kligerman; H F Lopes; J R Wance; F P Paiva; A Benévolo; E Q Freitas
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 3.147

3.  Craniofacial resection for tumors of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses--a 17-year experience.

Authors:  V J Lund; D J Howard; W I Wei; A D Cheesman
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 4.  Surgical Techniques for Sinonasal Malignancies.

Authors:  Alexander Farag; Marc Rosen; James Evans
Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  Tumors of the skull base: outcome and survival analysis of 77 cases.

Authors:  J C Irish; P J Gullane; F Gentili; J Freeman; J B Boyd; D Brown; J Rutka
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1994 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Complications of craniofacial resection for tumors involving the anterior skull base.

Authors:  D H Kraus; J P Shah; E Arbit; J H Galicich; E W Strong
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Patterns of dural involvement in sinonasal tumors: prospective correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and histopathologic findings.

Authors:  John B McIntyre; Carlos Perez; Mrudula Penta; Liyue Tong; John Truelson; Pete S Batra
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.858

8.  Cancer of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. A clinico-pathological study of 277 patients.

Authors:  G Harbo; C Grau; T Bundgaard; M Overgaard; O Elbrønd; H Søgaard; J Overgaard
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.089

9.  Low- and high-grade esthesioneuroblastomas display a distinct natural history and outcome.

Authors:  Gabriel G Malouf; Odile Casiraghi; Eric Deutsch; Joel Guigay; Stéphane Temam; Jean Bourhis
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Dural invasion by craniofacial and calvarial neoplasms: MR imaging and histopathologic evaluation.

Authors:  J Ahmadi; D R Hinton; H D Segall; W T Couldwell; R B Stanley
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Management of squamous cell carcinomas of the skull-base.

Authors:  Colin G Leonard; Vikram Padhye; Ian J Witterick
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 4.130

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.