Literature DB >> 16982972

Young patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: study of the involvement of GSTP1 and deregulation of the Fanconi anemia genes.

Steve Tremblay1, Patricia Pintor Dos Reis, Grace Bradley, Natalie Naranjo Galloni, Bayardo Perez-Ordonez, Jeremy Freeman, Dale Brown, Ralph Gilbert, Patrick Gullane, Jonathan Irish, Suzanne Kamel-Reid.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) from young (</=40 years) and older (>/=60 years) patients have differential expression levels of GSTP1, FANCA, FANCC, FANCD2, and FANCG.
DESIGN: Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical analysis were used to assess gene and protein expression, respectively.
SETTING: This study was performed in a research institute within a hospital setting. PATIENTS: Our study group consisted of 104 patients (42 young and 62 older). We collected RNA from 32 OSCC samples (10 young and 22 older patients) for gene expression analysis. Seventy-seven OSCC samples (37 from young and 40 from older patients) were used for protein expression analysis. Five patients were studied in both analyses.
RESULTS: Lower expression of GSTP1 (P = .04) and FANCA (P = .01) was observed in the tumors of young compared with older patients. We also detected lower expression of GSTP1 in the tumors of young patients compared with their nondysplastic mucosa (P = .01). FANCA was underexpressed in nondysplastic mucosa of young compared with older patients (P = .01). GSTP1 protein showed negative or low expression in 41% (n = 15 of 37) of young vs 5% (n = 2 of 40) of older patient tumors (P = .001). FANCG protein expression was absent or low in 81% (n = 30 of 37) of young compared with 36% (n = 15 of 40) of older patient tumors (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in expression levels of GSTP1, FANCA, and FANCG in OSCC of young and older patients suggest that different mechanisms may be involved in tumor development through defective carcinogen metabolism and/or DNA repair capabilities. GSTP1 plays a key role in detoxification; therefore, underexpression of this gene in tumors of young patients may cause deficient detoxification that could lead to an increased susceptibility to the development of oral carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16982972     DOI: 10.1001/archotol.132.9.958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0886-4470


  10 in total

1.  Comprehensive review of genetic factors contributing to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma development in low-risk, nontraditional patients.

Authors:  Morgan A Gingerich; Joshua D Smith; Nicole L Michmerhuizen; Megan Ludwig; Samantha Devenport; Chloe Matovina; Chad Brenner; Steven B Chinn
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 3.147

2.  Unusual presentation of oral squamous cell carcinoma in a young woman.

Authors:  Diurianne Cc França; Lira M Monti; Alvimar L de Castro; Ana Mp Soubhia; Luiz Er Volpato; Sandra Mhc Á de Aguiar; Marcelo C Goiato
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2012-04-09

Review 3.  Age-specific oncogenic pathways in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma - are elderly a different subcategory?

Authors:  Martine Froukje van der Kamp; Gyorgy Bela Halmos; Victor Guryev; Peter Laszlo Horvatovich; Ed Schuuring; Bernardus Franciscus Augustinus Maria van der Laan; Bert van der Vegt; Boudewijn Evert Christiaan Plaat; Cornelia Johanna Verhoeven
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.730

Review 4.  Comparison of tobacco and alcohol consumption in young and older patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Elis Ângela Batistella; Rogério Gondak; Elena Riet Correa Rivero; Saman Warnakulasuriya; Eliete Guerra; André Luís Porporatti; Graziela De Luca Canto
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 5.  Are Survival Outcomes Different for Young and Old Patients with Oral and Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Swagatika Panda; Neeta Mohanty; Saurav Panda; Lora Mishra; Divya Gopinath; Alkananda Sahoo; Sumanth Kumbargere Nagraj; Barbara Lapinska
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Malignant transformation of oral epithelial dysplasia in Southwest Finland.

Authors:  Toni T Nevanpää; Antti E Terävä; Hanna K Laine; Jaana Rautava
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Glutathione S-Transferase P1 (GSTP1) gene polymorphism increases age-related susceptibility to hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Yao-Li Chen; Hsin-Shun Tseng; Wu-Hsien Kuo; Shun-Fa Yang; Dar-Ren Chen; Hsiu-Ting Tsai
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.103

Review 8.  The Fanconi anemia pathway: repairing the link between DNA damage and squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Lindsey E Romick-Rosendale; Vivian W Y Lui; Jennifer R Grandis; Susanne I Wells
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 2.433

9.  GTSP1 expression in non-smoker and non-drinker patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Authors:  Pamela de Oliveira Soares; Patrícia Maluf Cury; Rossana Verónica Mendoza López; Cláudio Roberto Cernea; Erika Erina Fukuyama; David Livingstone Alves Figueiredo; Francisco Gorgonio da Nobrega; Otavio Alberto Curioni; Fabio Daumas Nunes; Raquel Ajub Moyses; Maria Lúcia Bueno Garcia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Genome stability pathways in head and neck cancers.

Authors:  Glenn Jenkins; Kenneth J O'Byrne; Benedict Panizza; Derek J Richard
Journal:  Int J Genomics       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 2.326

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.