Literature DB >> 16981246

Spatial and acoustic pressure dependence of microbubble-mediated gene delivery targeted using focused ultrasound.

Ahad A Rahim1, Sarah L Taylor, Nigel L Bush, Gail R ter Haar, Jeffrey C Bamber, Colin D Porter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound/microbubble-mediated gene delivery has the potential to be targeted to tissue deep in the body by directing the ultrasound beam following vector administration. Application of this technology would be minimally invasive and benefit from the widespread clinical experience of using ultrasound and microbubble contrast agents. In this study we evaluate the targeting ability and spatial distribution of gene delivery using focused ultrasound.
METHODS: Using a custom-built exposure tank, Chinese hamster ovary cells in the presence of SonoVue microbubbles and plasmid encoding beta-galactosidase were exposed to ultrasound in the focal plane of a 1 MHz transducer. Gene delivery and cell viability were subsequently assessed. Characterisation of the acoustic field and high-resolution spatial analysis of transfection were used to examine the relationship between gene delivery efficiency and acoustic pressure.
RESULTS: In contrast to that seen in the homogeneous field close to the transducer face, gene delivery in the focal plane was concentrated on the ultrasound beam axis. Above a minimum peak-to-peak value of 0.1 MPa, transfection efficiency increased as acoustic pressure increased towards the focus, reaching a maximum above 1 MPa. Delivery was microbubble-dependent and cell viability was maintained.
CONCLUSIONS: Gene delivery can be targeted using focused ultrasound and microbubbles. Since delivery is dependent on acoustic pressure, the degree of targeting can be determined by appropriate transducer design to modify the ultrasound field. In contrast to other physical gene delivery approaches, the non-invasive targeting ability of ultrasound makes this technology an attractive option for clinical gene therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16981246     DOI: 10.1002/jgm.962

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gene Med        ISSN: 1099-498X            Impact factor:   4.565


  12 in total

Review 1.  MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery, present and future.

Authors:  David Schlesinger; Stanley Benedict; Chris Diederich; Wladyslaw Gedroyc; Alexander Klibanov; James Larner
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Focused in vivo delivery of plasmid DNA to the porcine vascular wall via intravascular ultrasound destruction of microbubbles.

Authors:  Linsey C Phillips; Alexander L Klibanov; Douglas K Bowles; Michael Ragosta; John A Hossack; Brian R Wamhoff
Journal:  J Vasc Res       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 1.934

3.  Key factors that affect sonoporation efficiency in in vitro settings: the importance of standing wave in sonoporation.

Authors:  Manabu Kinoshita; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 3.575

4.  Safety and bio-effects of ultrasound contrast agents.

Authors:  Gail ter Haar
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Quantitative evaluation of ultrasound-mediated cellular uptake of a fluorescent model drug.

Authors:  Matthieu Lepetit-Coiffé; Anna Yudina; Christel Poujol; Philippe Lourenco de Oliveira; Franck Couillaud; Chrit T W Moonen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 6.  Heating technology for malignant tumors: a review.

Authors:  H Petra Kok; Erik N K Cressman; Wim Ceelen; Christopher L Brace; Robert Ivkov; Holger Grüll; Gail Ter Haar; Peter Wust; Johannes Crezee
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 3.914

7.  Site-specific sonoporation of human melanoma cells at the cellular level using high lateral-resolution ultrasonic micro-transducer arrays.

Authors:  Myo Thein; An Cheng; Payal Khanna; Chunfeng Zhang; Eun-Joo Park; Daniel Ahmed; Christopher J Goodrich; Fareid Asphahani; Fengbing Wu; Nadine B Smith; Cheng Dong; Xiaoning Jiang; Miqin Zhang; Jian Xu
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 10.618

8.  Development of therapeutic microbubbles for enhancing ultrasound-mediated gene delivery.

Authors:  Ryan R Sun; Misty L Noble; Samuel S Sun; Shuxian Song; Carol H Miao
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 9.776

9.  Comparative analysis of gene transfer to human and rat retinal pigment epithelium cell line by a combinatorial use of recombinant adeno- associated virus and ultrasound or/and microbubbles.

Authors:  Xiao-Zhi Zheng; Hong-Li Li; Lian-Fang Du; Hui-Ping Wang; Qing Gu
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.363

10.  Design and Characterization of Fibrin-Based Acoustically Responsive Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications.

Authors:  Alexander Moncion; Keith J Arlotta; Oliver D Kripfgans; J Brian Fowlkes; Paul L Carson; Andrew J Putnam; Renny T Franceschi; Mario L Fabiilli
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.