BACKGROUND: The use of the immunosuppressive agent sirolimus is increasing in renal transplantation but its monitoring often requires high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultra-violet (UV) or tandem mass spectrometric (MS-MS) detection. The aim of this study was to compare a new microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA, Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay) on IMx Abbott Analyser with a liquid chromatography-mass spectometry (LC-MS) method. METHOD: The accuracy of immunoassay analytical performance including within run and between run imprecision and linearity was tested. For comparison studies, sirolimus level was then determined with the two methods on 98 samples from 52 transplant patients. RESULTS: Total intra-assay and inter-assay variation coefficients were below 10% at the three levels tested, and the coefficient of linearity was r = 0.99. The values obtained were highly correlated with the LC-MS method (MEIA = 1.02LC-MS + 0.91; r(2) = 0.87). As a result, the immunoassay showed good performance, and clinical sample measurements were not affected by the method. The MEIA may be a useful alternative for routine monitoring of sirolimus.
BACKGROUND: The use of the immunosuppressive agent sirolimus is increasing in renal transplantation but its monitoring often requires high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with ultra-violet (UV) or tandem mass spectrometric (MS-MS) detection. The aim of this study was to compare a new microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA, Microparticle Enzyme Immunoassay) on IMx Abbott Analyser with a liquid chromatography-mass spectometry (LC-MS) method. METHOD: The accuracy of immunoassay analytical performance including within run and between run imprecision and linearity was tested. For comparison studies, sirolimus level was then determined with the two methods on 98 samples from 52 transplant patients. RESULTS: Total intra-assay and inter-assay variation coefficients were below 10% at the three levels tested, and the coefficient of linearity was r = 0.99. The values obtained were highly correlated with the LC-MS method (MEIA = 1.02LC-MS + 0.91; r(2) = 0.87). As a result, the immunoassay showed good performance, and clinical sample measurements were not affected by the method. The MEIA may be a useful alternative for routine monitoring of sirolimus.
Authors: S Fabre; C Guisset; L Tatem; N Dossat; A M Dupuy; J D Cohen; J P Cristol; J P Daures; C Jorgensen Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: S Fabre; A M Dupuy; N Dossat; C Guisset; J D Cohen; J P Cristol; J P Daures; C Jorgensen Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2008-06-18 Impact factor: 4.330