Literature DB >> 16978286

Laparoscopic varicocele ligation in children and adolescents using isosulphan blue: a prospective randomized trial.

Christian Schwentner1, Christian Radmayr, Andreas Lunacek, Christian Gozzi, Germar M Pinggera, Richard Neururer, Reinhard Peschel, Georg Bartsch, Josef Oswald.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate, in a randomized prospective trial in children and adolescents, the feasibility of isosulphan blue-based lymphatic vessel preservation during laparoscopic varicocelectomy and its impact on the complication rate, as the operative management of varicoceles remains controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 50 consecutive patients were randomly assigned to two laparoscopic varicocelectomy groups. The indications for surgery included scrotal pain and a difference in testicular size, as well as severe cosmetic impairment. All the patients had a laparoscopic varicocelectomy using three ports. Patients in group A had standard laparoscopy, while those in group B had additional isosulphan blue administered. After surgery, the patients were assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months for varicocele recurrence, hydrocele formation, atrophy, pain or other complications.
RESULTS: There were no intraoperative complications or conversions to open surgery. There were no adverse reactions, scrotal haematomas or atrophy. At 3 months after surgery, the incidence of hydrocele in group A was 20% whereas in group B no hydroceles were detected (P = 0.025); at 6 months the 20% still had hydroceles. One patient in each group had varicocele recurrence associated with persistent pain. In two patients in group B, blue pigmentation of the left hemiscrotum persisted at the 3-month follow-up but resolved by 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic repair of varicoceles using isosulphan blue helps to identify and preserve the lymphatic drainage. It prevents secondary hydrocele formation, the most common complication, with no supplementary risk to the patient. Also, testicular oedema causing impaired spermatogenesis can be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16978286     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06428.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  7 in total

Review 1.  Management of hydrocele in adolescent patients.

Authors:  Marcello Cimador; Marco Castagnetti; Enrico De Grazia
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Macroscopic and microsurgical varicocelectomy: what's the intraoperative difference?

Authors:  Xiaopeng Liu; Hao Zhang; Xingxing Ruan; Hengjun Xiao; Wentao Huang; Liaoyuan Li; Xin Gao; Yan Zhang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  The role of testicular artery in laparoscopic varicocelectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaokang Qi; Kunpeng Wang; Guangchen Zhou; Zhen Xu; Junjie Yu; Wei Zhang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  [Varicocele in children and adolescents-conservative vs. surgical treatment?]

Authors:  T Yiakoumos; T Kälble
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Management options of varicoceles.

Authors:  Peter Chan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01

6.  Loupe-assisted versus microscopic varicocelectomy: is there an intraoperative anatomic difference?

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Xiao-Peng Liu; Xiao-Jian Yang; Wen-Tao Huang; Xing-Xing Ruan; Heng-Jun Xiao; Liao-Yuan Li; Xin Gao; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 7.  Management and Treatment of Varicocele in Children and Adolescents: An Endocrinologic Perspective.

Authors:  Rossella Cannarella; Aldo E Calogero; Rosita A Condorelli; Filippo Giacone; Antonio Aversa; Sandro La Vignera
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-09-08       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.