Literature DB >> 16977652

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life questionnaire cervical cancer module: EORTC QLQ-CX24.

Elfriede R Greimel1, Karin Kuljanic Vlasic, Ann-Charlotte Waldenstrom, Vlatka M Duric, Pernille T Jensen, Susanne Singer, Weichu Chie, Andy Nordin, Vesna Bjelic Radisic, Dariusz Wydra.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors report on the development and validation of a cervical cancer module for the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality-of-Life (QoL) questionnaire (QLQ), which was designed to assess disease-specific and treatment-specific aspects of QoL in patients with cervical cancer.
METHODS: The cervical cancer module (EORTC QLQ-CX24) was developed in a multicultural, multidisciplinary setting to supplement the EORTC QLQ-C30 core questionnaire. The QLQ-C30 and the cervical cancer module were administered to 346 patients with cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and received radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Psychometric analyses were performed by using data from 2 independent samples.
RESULTS: The QLQ-CX24 consists of 3 multiitem scales and 5 single-item scales. Multitrait scaling analyses revealed high internal consistencies for the subscales with Cronbach alpha coefficients ranging from .72 to .87 (Symptom Experience, .72; Body Image, .86; Sexual/Vaginal Functioning, .87). Convergent and discriminant validity were fulfilled with scaling errors below 3%. The QLQ-CX24 was capable of discriminating between clinical subgroups. All items exhibited good compliance with <3% missing values. Most patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the QLQ-CX24 in <15 minutes (86%), and many did not require any assistance to complete the questionnaires (65%).
CONCLUSIONS: The current psychometric analyses supported the content and construct validity and the reliability of the EORTC QLQ-CX24 module. This newly developed module is a useful instrument for assessing the QoL of patients who are treated for cervical cancer both in clinical trials and in clinical practice. 2006 American Cancer Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16977652     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.22217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  52 in total

Review 1.  Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).

Authors:  Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Apiwat Aue-Aungkul; Khadra Galaal; Chetta Ngamjarus; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-12

2.  Changes in fatigue in rectal cancer patients before and after therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chang Wen-Pei; Jen Hsiu-Ju
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Impact of chemoradiotherapy on vaginal and sexual function of patients with FIGO IIb cervical cancer.

Authors:  Dženita Ljuca; Goran Marošević
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.363

4.  Sexual function after intracavitary vaginal brachytherapy for early-stage endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Allison M Quick; Leigh G Seamon; Mahmoud Abdel-Rasoul; Ritu Salani; Douglas Martin
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  Do clinicians and patients agree regarding symptoms? A comparison after definitive radiochemotherapy in 223 uterine cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  K Kirchheiner; R Nout; J Lindegaard; P Petrič; E V Limbergen; I-M Jürgenliemk-Schulz; C Haie-Meder; R Pötter; W Dörr
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 6.  Body image in cancer survivors: a systematic review of case-control studies.

Authors:  Vicky Lehmann; Mariët Hagedoorn; Marrit A Tuinman
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Prediction of rehabilitation needs after treatment of cervical cancer: what do late adverse effects tell us?

Authors:  Tina Broby Mikkelsen; Bente Sørensen; Karin B Dieperink
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  Cervical cancer survivorship: long-term quality of life and social support.

Authors:  Krista S Pfaendler; Lari Wenzel; Mindy B Mechanic; Kristine R Penner
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 3.393

9.  Quality of life measurement in women with cervical cancer: implications for Chinese cervical cancer survivors.

Authors:  Ying Chun Zeng; Shirley S Y Ching; Alice Y Loke
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Postoperative Health-Related Quality of Life of Cervical Cancer Patients - A Comparison between the Wertheim-Meigs Operation and Total Mesometrial Resection (TMMR).

Authors:  E Sowa; S Kuhnt; A Hinz; C Schröder; T Deutsch; K Geue
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.