Literature DB >> 16973444

Acrylamide: review of toxicity data and dose-response analyses for cancer and noncancer effects.

A Shipp1, G Lawrence, R Gentry, T McDonald, H Bartow, J Bounds, N Macdonald, H Clewell, B Allen, C Van Landingham.   

Abstract

Acrylamide (ACR) is used in the manufacture of polyacrylamides and has recently been shown to form when foods, typically containing certain nutrients, are cooked at normal cooking temperatures (e.g., frying, grilling or baking). The toxicity of ACR has been extensively investigated. The major findings of these studies indicate that ACR is neurotoxic in animals and humans, and it has been shown to be a reproductive toxicant in animal models and a rodent carcinogen. Several reviews of ACR toxicity have been conducted and ACR has been categorized as to its potential to be a human carcinogen in these reviews. Allowable levels based on the toxicity data concurrently available had been developed by the U.S. EPA. New data have been published since the U.S. EPA review in 1991. The purpose of this investigation was to review the toxicity data, identify any new relevant data, and select those data to be used in dose-response modeling. Proposed revised cancer and noncancer toxicity values were estimated using the newest U.S. EPA guidelines for cancer risk assessment and noncancer hazard assessment. Assessment of noncancer endpoints using benchmark models resulted in a reference dose (RfD) of 0.83 microg/kg/day based on reproductive effects, and 1.2 microg/kg/day based on neurotoxicity. Thyroid tumors in male and female rats were the only endpoint relevant to human health and were selected to estimate the point of departure (POD) using the multistage model. Because the mode of action of acrylamide in thyroid tumor formation is not known with certainty, both linear and nonlinear low-dose extrapolations were conducted under the assumption that glycidamide or ACR, respectively, were the active agent. Under the U.S. EPA guidelines (2005), when a chemical produces rodent tumors by a nonlinear or threshold mode of action, an RfD is calculated using the most relevant POD and application of uncertainty factors. The RfD was estimated to be 1.5 microg/kg/day based on the use of the area under the curve (AUC) for ACR hemoglobin adducts under the assumption that the parent, ACR, is the proximate carcinogen in rodents by a nonlinear mode of action. When the mode of action in assumed to be linear in the low-dose region, a risk-specific dose corresponding to a specified level of risk (e.g., 1 x 10-5) is estimated, and, in the case of ACR, was 9.5 x 10-2 microg ACR/kg/day based on the use of the AUC for glycidamide adduct data. However, it should be noted that although this review was intended to be comprehensive, it is not exhaustive, as new data are being published continuously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16973444     DOI: 10.1080/10408440600851377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  48 in total

1.  Carcinogenicity of glycidamide in B6C3F1 mice and F344/N rats from a two-year drinking water exposure.

Authors:  Frederick A Beland; Greg R Olson; Maria C B Mendoza; M Matilde Marques; Daniel R Doerge
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 6.023

Review 2.  Quantifying exploratory low dose compounds in humans with AMS.

Authors:  Stephen R Dueker; Le T Vuong; Peter N Lohstroh; Jason A Giacomo; John S Vogel
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 15.470

3.  Diet, lifestyle, and acute myeloid leukemia in the NIH-AARP cohort.

Authors:  Xiaomei Ma; Yikyung Park; Susan T Mayne; Rong Wang; Rashmi Sinha; Albert R Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Amanda J Cross
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 4.  The legacy of the F344 rat as a cancer bioassay model (a retrospective summary of three common F344 rat neoplasms).

Authors:  Robert R Maronpot; Abraham Nyska; Jennifer E Foreman; Yuval Ramot
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-09       Impact factor: 5.635

5.  Monitoring of acrylamide carcinogen in selected heat-treated foods from Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Mohammad Rizwan Khan; Zeid Abdullah Alothman; Mu Naushad; Ahmed Khodran Alomary; Sulaiman Mohammed Alfadul
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.391

6.  Low dose assessment of the carcinogenicity of furan in male F344/N Nctr rats in a 2-year gavage study.

Authors:  Linda S Von Tungeln; Nigel J Walker; Greg R Olson; Maria C B Mendoza; Robert P Felton; Brett T Thorn; M Matilde Marques; Igor P Pogribny; Daniel R Doerge; Frederick A Beland
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 6.023

7.  Dietary acrylamide exposure was associated with increased cancer mortality in Chinese elderly men and women: a 11-year prospective study of Mr. and Ms. OS Hong Kong.

Authors:  Zhao-Min Liu; Lap Ah Tse; Suzanne C Ho; Suyang Wu; Bailing Chen; Dicken Chan; Samuel Yeung-Shan Wong
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Exposure of the U.S. population to acrylamide in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2003-2004.

Authors:  Hubert W Vesper; Samuel P Caudill; John D Osterloh; Tunde Meyers; Deanna Scott; Gary L Myers
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Diet-induced obesity in male mice is associated with reduced fertility and potentiation of acrylamide-induced reproductive toxicity.

Authors:  Burhan I Ghanayem; Re Bai; Grace E Kissling; Greg Travlos; Undi Hoffler
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 4.285

10.  Association among acrylamide, blood insulin, and insulin resistance in adults.

Authors:  Chien-Yu Lin; Yu-Chuan Lin; Hsu-Ko Kuo; Juey-Jen Hwang; Jiunn-Lee Lin; Pau-Chung Chen; Lian-Yu Lin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-09-03       Impact factor: 17.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.