Literature DB >> 16971645

Performance of rapid streptococcal antigen testing varies by personnel.

James W Fox1, Daniel M Cohen, Mario J Marcon, William H Cotton, Bema K Bonsu.   

Abstract

Rapid carbohydrate antigen tests are frequently used to diagnose group A streptococcal (GAS) pharyngitis. Despite evidence of modest sensitivity in medical settings, rapid antigen tests are available to the public for self-testing. We sought to determine if the personnel performing a rapid streptococcal antigen test influence the test's performance characteristics. Throat swabs of pediatric patients performed for GAS pharyngitis in a tertiary-care children's hospital network were included during two study periods in 2004 and 2005. The performance characteristics of a rapid carbohydrate antigen test were evaluated in three clinical settings against a nucleic acid probe test method according to the personnel performing the test (laboratory technologist versus nonlaboratory personnel). Between the study periods, nonlaboratory personnel from one site underwent retraining. Subsequently, the performance characteristics of the rapid antigen test were reassessed. The sensitivity of the rapid antigen test varied widely among the different testing sites (56 to 90%). Notably, test sensitivity was consistently greater when the test was performed by laboratory technologists than when it was performed by nonlaboratory personnel (P < 0.0001). Although the rapid antigen test sensitivity significantly improved after nonlaboratory personnel at one testing site were retrained (sensitivity before versus after retraining; P < 0.0001), the sensitivity remained greater in the laboratory technologist cohort (P < 0.0001). These data confirm the important relationship of the operator performing a rapid streptococcal antigen test with the test's accuracy, even in a clinical setting, where operator training is mandated. Therefore, its use outside the medical setting by lay persons cannot be recommended without culture backup.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16971645      PMCID: PMC1698329          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01399-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  30 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of throat cultures and rapid strep tests for diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis.

Authors:  M A Gerber
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Use of a rapid strep test (First Response) by parents for detection of streptococcal pharyngitis.

Authors:  R M Buchta
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 3.  Home diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis: moving the art in which direction?

Authors:  R W Steele
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.129

4.  Detection of group A streptococcal antigen from throat swabs by use of a latex agglutination test kit in general practice.

Authors:  S Hoffmann; J Henrichsen
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B       Date:  1987-04

5.  The accuracy of experienced physicians' probability estimates for patients with sore throats. Implications for decision making.

Authors:  R M Poses; R D Cebul; M Collins; S S Fager
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-08-16       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Antigen detection test for streptococcal pharyngitis: evaluation of sensitivity with respect to true infections.

Authors:  M A Gerber; M F Randolph; J Chanatry; L L Wright; K K DeMeo; L R Anderson
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  The effect of penicillin therapy on the symptoms and signs of streptococcal pharyngitis.

Authors:  J D Nelson
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb

8.  Comparison of the Gen-Probe Group A streptococcus Direct Test with culture and a rapid streptococcal antigen detection assay for diagnosis of streptococcal pharyngitis.

Authors:  B J Heiter; P P Bourbeau
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Streptococcal pharyngitis. Placebo-controlled double-blind evaluation of clinical response to penicillin therapy.

Authors:  M S Krober; J W Bass; G N Michels
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1985-03-01       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Group A streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis: cost-effective diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  M E Pichichero
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.721

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The Point-of-Care Laboratory in Clinical Microbiology.

Authors:  Michel Drancourt; Audrey Michel-Lepage; Sylvie Boyer; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Rapid antigen test use for the management of group A streptococcal pharyngitis in community pharmacies.

Authors:  Béatrice Demoré; Gianpiero Tebano; Julien Gravoulet; Christophe Wilcke; Eric Ruspini; Jacques Birgé; Jean-Marc Boivin; Sandrine Hénard; Annick Dieterling; Lidiana Munerol; Julie Husson; Christian Rabaud; Céline Pulcini; Sophie Malblanc
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Effect of clinical spectrum, inoculum size and physician characteristics on sensitivity of a rapid antigen detection test for group A streptococcal pharyngitis.

Authors:  J F Cohen; M Chalumeau; C Levy; P Bidet; M Benani; M Koskas; E Bingen; R Cohen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Detection of strep throat causing bacterium directly from medical swabs by touch spray-mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Alan K Jarmusch; Valentina Pirro; Kevin S Kerian; R Graham Cooks
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 5.  Rapid antigen detection test for group A streptococcus in children with pharyngitis.

Authors:  Jérémie F Cohen; Nathalie Bertille; Robert Cohen; Martin Chalumeau
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-04

Review 6.  Rapid antigen group A streptococcus test to diagnose pharyngitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emily H Stewart; Brian Davis; B Lee Clemans-Taylor; Benjamin Littenberg; Carlos A Estrada; Robert M Centor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Jérémie F Cohen; Daniël A Korevaar; Douglas G Altman; David E Bruns; Constantine A Gatsonis; Lotty Hooft; Les Irwig; Deborah Levine; Johannes B Reitsma; Henrica C W de Vet; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  High diagnostic accuracy of automated rapid Strep A test reduces antibiotic prescriptions for children in the United Arab Emirates.

Authors:  Salama Bin Hendi; Zainab A Malik; Amar Hassan Khamis; Fadil Y A Al-Najjar
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 2.125

9.  Evaluation of the Serological Point-of-Care Testing of Infectious Mononucleosis by Data of External Quality Control Samples.

Authors:  Salla J Kiiskinen; Oskari Luomala; Teija Häkkinen; Susanna Lukinmaa-Åberg; Anja Siitonen
Journal:  Microbiol Insights       Date:  2020-12-03

10.  Operator Influence on Blinded Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care Antigen Testing for Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis.

Authors:  Carla Penney; Robert Porter; Mary O'Brien; Peter Daley
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 2.471

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.