OBJECTIVE: To develop a method for the assessment of colorectal permeability in septic patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational study in ICUs at two university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Nine patients with septic shock and abdominal focus of infection, 7 with severe sepsis and pulmonary focus and 8 healthy subjects. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Colorectal permeability was assessed as the initial appearance rate of (99m)Tc-DTPA in plasma after instillation into the rectal lumen and as the cumulative systemic recovery at 1h. To calculate the latter, volume of distribution and renal clearance of (99m)Tc-DTPA was estimated by an i.v. bolus of (51)Cr-EDTA. The initial rate of permeability was increased in patients with septic shock and severe sepsis compared with controls [29.0 (3.7-83.3), 20.6 (3.6-65.5) and 6.0 (2.2-9.6)cpm ml(-1)min(-1), respectively, p<0.05)] with a positive linear trend (r (2)=0.27, p=0.01) and correlated to L-lactate concentrations in the rectal lumen (r (2)=0.39, p<0.05). The cumulative permeability was also increased in patients with septic shock and severe sepsis compared with controls [2.07 (0.05-15.7), 0.32 (0.01-1.2) and 0.03 (0.01-0.06) per thousand, respectively, p<0.01] and correlated to the initial permeability rate (r (2)=0.26, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In septic patients, the systemic recovery of a luminally applied marker of paracellular permeability was increased and related to the luminal concentrations of L-lactate and possibly to disease severity. This suggests that the assessment of colorectal permeability by systemic recovery of (99m)Tc-DTPA is valid and that metabolic dysfunction of the mucosa contributes to increased permeability of the large bowel in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a method for the assessment of colorectal permeability in septic patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: Observational study in ICUs at two university hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Nine patients with septic shock and abdominal focus of infection, 7 with severe sepsis and pulmonary focus and 8 healthy subjects. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Colorectal permeability was assessed as the initial appearance rate of (99m)Tc-DTPA in plasma after instillation into the rectal lumen and as the cumulative systemic recovery at 1h. To calculate the latter, volume of distribution and renal clearance of (99m)Tc-DTPA was estimated by an i.v. bolus of (51)Cr-EDTA. The initial rate of permeability was increased in patients with septic shock and severe sepsis compared with controls [29.0 (3.7-83.3), 20.6 (3.6-65.5) and 6.0 (2.2-9.6)cpm ml(-1)min(-1), respectively, p<0.05)] with a positive linear trend (r (2)=0.27, p=0.01) and correlated to L-lactate concentrations in the rectal lumen (r (2)=0.39, p<0.05). The cumulative permeability was also increased in patients with septic shock and severe sepsis compared with controls [2.07 (0.05-15.7), 0.32 (0.01-1.2) and 0.03 (0.01-0.06) per thousand, respectively, p<0.01] and correlated to the initial permeability rate (r (2)=0.26, p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In septic patients, the systemic recovery of a luminally applied marker of paracellular permeability was increased and related to the luminal concentrations of L-lactate and possibly to disease severity. This suggests that the assessment of colorectal permeability by systemic recovery of (99m)Tc-DTPA is valid and that metabolic dysfunction of the mucosa contributes to increased permeability of the large bowel in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.
Authors: Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten; Peter J van der Voort; Frans J Hoek; Rob J Bosman; Johan I van der Spoel; Durk F Zandstra Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2001-11-23 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: C J Doig; L R Sutherland; J D Sandham; G H Fick; M Verhoef; J B Meddings Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: R Phillip Dellinger; Jean M Carlet; Henry Masur; Herwig Gerlach; Thierry Calandra; Jonathan Cohen; Juan Gea-Banacloche; Didier Keh; John C Marshall; Margaret M Parker; Graham Ramsay; Janice L Zimmerman; Jean-Louis Vincent; M M Levy Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2004-03-03 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Daniel De Backer; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Duncan Macrae; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerôme Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-02-14 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Daniel De Backer; Gustavo Ospina-Tascon; Diamantino Salgado; Raphaël Favory; Jacques Creteur; Jean-Louis Vincent Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-08-06 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Mabel N Abraham; Alexander P Kelly; Ariel B Brandwein; Tiago D Fernandes; Daniel E Leisman; Matthew D Taylor; Mariana R Brewer; Christine A Capone; Clifford S Deutschman Journal: Shock Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.454
Authors: Washington Pires; Christiano E Veneroso; Samuel P Wanner; Diogo A S Pacheco; Gisele C Vaz; Fabiano T Amorim; Cajsa Tonoli; Danusa D Soares; Cândido C Coimbra Journal: Sports Med Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Bruna B Nascimento; Christiane T Cartelle; Maria de L Noviello; Breno V Pinheiro; Ricardo W de Almeida Vitor; Danielle da G Souza; Simone de Vasconcelos Generoso; Valbert N Cardoso; Flaviano Dos S Martins; Jacques R Nicoli; Rosa M E Arantes Journal: Int J Exp Pathol Date: 2017-09-11 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: Lauri Pynnönen; Minna Minkkinen; Sari Räty; Juhani Sand; Isto Nordback; Anders Perner; Jyrki Tenhunen Journal: BMC Gastroenterol Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 3.067