Literature DB >> 11907655

Pitfalls in gastrointestinal permeability measurement in ICU patients with multiple organ failure using differential sugar absorption.

Heleen M Oudemans-van Straaten1, Peter J van der Voort, Frans J Hoek, Rob J Bosman, Johan I van der Spoel, Durk F Zandstra.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether gastrointestinal permeability (GIP) at intensive care unit (ICU) admission, measured by differential sugar absorption, is related to severity of disease and multiple organ failure (MOF). Post hoc, to analyse the relation between the urinary sugar recovery and renal function.
DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study.
SETTING: Eighteen-bed general ICU of a teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Sixty-four ventilated patients admitted with MOF.
INTERVENTIONS: GIP was assessed within 24 h using cellobiose (C), sucrose (S) and mannitol (M) absorption. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: Severity of disease: APACHE II and III, SAPS II and MPM II systems. Organ failure: SOFA, MODS and Goris score. The median urinary recovery of C was 0.147% (range 0.004-2.145%), of S 0.249% (0.001-3.656%) and of M 10.7% (0.6-270%). In 16 patients, M recovery was over 100% of the oral dose. They received red blood cell transfusion (RBC). In the non-transfused, the median cellobiose/mannitol (CM) ratio was 0.015 (0.0004-0.550). CM ratio was not related to severity of disease and inversely related to the SOFA score ( r=-0.30, p=0.04). Post hoc regression analysis showed that recoveries of C, S and M were positively related to urinary volume. Recoveries of C and S, but not of M, were positively related to creatinine clearance. The CM ratio corrected for diuresis, but was inversely related to creatinine clearance.
CONCLUSIONS: Differential C, S and M absorption testing is unreliable after RBC transfusion, since bank blood contains mannitol. The excretion of C and S, but not of M, is limited by renal dysfunction. Differential sugar absorption is not reliable to test GIP in MOF patients, since non-permeability related factors act as confounders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11907655     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-001-1140-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  13 in total

1.  Clinical tests of gastrointestinal permeability that rely on the urinary recovery of enterally administered probes can yield invalid results in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Mitchell P Fink
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-01-12       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Non-invasive assessment of barrier integrity and function of the human gut.

Authors:  Joep Grootjans; Geertje Thuijls; Froukje Verdam; Joep Pm Derikx; Kaatje Lenaerts; Wim A Buurman
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-27

3.  Increased colorectal permeability in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Vibeke L Jørgensen; Steen L Nielsen; Kurt Espersen; Anders Perner
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Measurement of the intestinal permeability in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Matty L Terpstra; Ramandeep Singh; Suzanne E Geerlings; Frederike J Bemelman
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-06

5.  Clinical characteristics associated with postoperative intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction in children with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Katri V Typpo; Claire B Larmonier; Jendar Deschenes; Daniel Redford; Pawel R Kiela; Fayez K Ghishan
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.624

6.  Splanchnic ischemia and gut permeability after acute brain injury secondary to intracranial hemorrhage.

Authors:  Glenn Hernández; Pablo Hasbun; Nicolas Velasco; Carol Wainstein; Guillermo Bugedo; Alejandro Bruhn; Julieta Klaassen; Luis Castillo
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Diagnosing malabsorption in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Martijn B Keur; Albertus Beishuizen; Adriaan A van Bodegraven
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2010-01-27

8.  Trauma: the role of the innate immune system.

Authors:  F Hietbrink; L Koenderman; Gt Rijkers; Lph Leenen
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2006-05-20       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Does fluid loading influence measurements of intestinal permeability?

Authors:  Ilkka Parviainen; Jukka Takala; Stephan M Jakob
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Pitfalls in gastrointestinal permeability measurement in ICU patients.

Authors:  Falco Hietbrink; Marc G H Besselink; Willem Renooij; Luke P H Leenen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-07-06       Impact factor: 17.440

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.