Literature DB >> 16964348

Semantic interoperability--HL7 Version 3 compared to advanced architecture standards.

B G M E Blobel1, K Engel, P Pharow.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To meet the challenge for high quality and efficient care, highly specialized and distributed healthcare establishments have to communicate and co-operate in a semantically interoperable way. Information and communication technology must be open, flexible, scalable, knowledge-based and service-oriented as well as secure and safe.
METHODS: For enabling semantic interoperability, a unified process for defining and implementing the architecture, i.e. structure and functions of the cooperating systems' components, as well as the approach for knowledge representation, i.e. the used information and its interpretation, algorithms, etc. have to be defined in a harmonized way. Deploying the Generic Component Model, systems and their components, underlying concepts and applied constraints must be formally modeled, strictly separating platform-independent from platform-specific models.
RESULTS: As HL7 Version 3 claims to represent the most successful standard for semantic interoperability, HL7 has been analyzed regarding the requirements for model-driven, service-oriented design of semantic interoperable information systems, thereby moving from a communication to an architecture paradigm. The approach is compared with advanced architectural approaches for information systems such as OMG's CORBA 3 or EHR systems such as GEHR/openEHR and CEN EN 13606 Electronic Health Record Communication.
CONCLUSION: HL7 Version 3 is maturing towards an architectural approach for semantic interoperability. Despite current differences, there is a close collaboration between the teams involved guaranteeing a convergence between competing approaches.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16964348

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Inf Med        ISSN: 0026-1270            Impact factor:   2.176


  6 in total

Review 1.  Biomedical informatics and outcomes research: enabling knowledge-driven health care.

Authors:  Peter J Embi; Stanley E Kaufman; Philip R O Payne
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Biomedical informatics and translational medicine.

Authors:  Indra Neil Sarkar
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 5.531

3.  Short Report About the Inpatient Health Services Standards in Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Morteza Izadi; Ali Ayoubian; Mohammadjavad Hoseinpourfard
Journal:  Electron Physician       Date:  2013-05-01

4.  Roadmap to a Comprehensive Clinical Data Warehouse for Precision Medicine Applications in Oncology.

Authors:  David J Foran; Wenjin Chen; Huiqi Chu; Evita Sadimin; Doreen Loh; Gregory Riedlinger; Lauri A Goodell; Shridar Ganesan; Kim Hirshfield; Lorna Rodriguez; Robert S DiPaola
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2017-03-02

5.  Defining health data elements under the HL7 development framework for metadata management.

Authors:  Zhe Yang; Kun Jiang; Miaomiao Lou; Yang Gong; Lili Zhang; Jing Liu; Xinyu Bao; Danhong Liu; Peng Yang
Journal:  J Biomed Semantics       Date:  2022-03-18

6.  Recommendations for ethical and responsible use of artificial intelligence in digital agriculture.

Authors:  Rozita Dara; Seyed Mehdi Hazrati Fard; Jasmin Kaur
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-07-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.