Literature DB >> 16963446

Structural basis for the differential regulation of DNA by the methionine repressor MetJ.

Anne Marie Augustus1, Patrick N Reardon, William T Heller, Leonard D Spicer.   

Abstract

The Met regulon in Escherichia coli encodes several proteins responsible for the biosynthesis of methionine. Regulation of the expression of most of these proteins is governed by the methionine repressor protein MetJ and its co-repressor, the methionine derivative S-adenosylmethionine. Genes controlled by MetJ contain from two to five sequential copies of a homologous 8-bp sequence called the metbox. A crystal structure for one of the complexes, the repressor tetramer bound to two metboxes, has been reported (Somers, W. S., and S. E. Phillips (1992) Nature 359, 387-393), but little structural work on the larger assemblies has been done presumably because of the difficulties in crystallization and the variability in the number and sequences of metboxes for the various genes. Small angle neutron scattering was used to study complexes of MetJ and S-adenosylmethionine with double-stranded DNA containing two, three, and five metboxes. Our results demonstrate that the crystal structure of the two-metbox complex is not the native solution conformation of the complex. Instead, the system adopts a less compact conformation in which there is decreased interaction between the adjacent MetJ dimers. Models built of the higher order complexes from the scattering data show that the three-metbox complex is organized much like the two-metbox complex. However, the five-metbox complex differs significantly from the smaller complexes, providing much closer packing of the adjacent MetJ dimers and allowing additional contacts not available in the crystal structure. The results suggest that there is a structural basis for the differences observed in the regulatory effectiveness of MetJ for the various genes of the Met regulon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16963446     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M605763200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  10 in total

1.  MetJ repressor interactions with DNA probed by in-cell NMR.

Authors:  Anne M Augustus; Patrick N Reardon; Leonard D Spicer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  New sources and instrumentation for neutrons in biology.

Authors:  S C M Teixeira; J Ankner; M C Bellissent-Funel; R Bewley; M P Blakeley; L Coates; R Dahint; R Dalgliesh; N Dencher; J Dhont; P Fischer; V T Forsyth; G Fragneto; B Frick; T Geue; R Gilles; T Gutberlet; M Haertlein; T Hauß; W Häußler; W T Heller; K Herwig; O Holderer; F Juranyi; R Kampmann; R Knott; J Kohlbrecher; S Kreuger; P Langan; R Lechner; G Lynn; C Majkrzak; R May; F Meilleur; Y Mo; K Mortensen; D A A Myles; F Natali; C Neylon; N Niimura; J Ollivier; A Ostermann; J Peters; J Pieper; A Rühm; D Schwahn; K Shibata; A K Soper; T Straessle; U-I Suzuki; I Tanaka; M Tehei; P Timmins; N Torikai; T Unruh; V Urban; R Vavrin; K Weiss; G Zaccai
Journal:  Chem Phys       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.348

3.  Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli W3110 for the production of L-methionine.

Authors:  Hua Li; Bao Shi Wang; You Ran Li; Liang Zhang; Zhong Yang Ding; Zheng Hua Gu; Gui Yang Shi
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Overlapping repressor binding sites regulate expression of the Methanococcus maripaludis glnK(1) operon.

Authors:  Thomas J Lie; Erik L Hendrickson; Ulf M Niess; Brian C Moore; Andrew K Haydock; John A Leigh
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.501

5.  Binding of MetJ repressor to specific and nonspecific DNA and effect of S-adenosylmethionine on these interactions.

Authors:  Anne M Augustus; Harvey Sage; Leonard D Spicer
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Combinatorial targeting of ribbon-helix-helix artificial transcription factors to chimeric recognition sites.

Authors:  Massimiliano Zampini; Finbarr Hayes
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Transcriptome and metabolome analysis of plant sulfate starvation and resupply provides novel information on transcriptional regulation of metabolism associated with sulfur, nitrogen and phosphorus nutritional responses in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Monika Bielecka; Mutsumi Watanabe; Rosa Morcuende; Wolf-Rüdiger Scheible; Malcolm J Hawkesford; Holger Hesse; Rainer Hoefgen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Production of FAME biodiesel in E. coli by direct methylation with an insect enzyme.

Authors:  Saken Sherkhanov; Tyler P Korman; Steven G Clarke; James U Bowie
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Dynamic allostery in the methionine repressor revealed by force distribution analysis.

Authors:  Wolfram Stacklies; Fei Xia; Frauke Gräter
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Fine-tuning of intrinsic N-Oct-3 POU domain allostery by regulatory DNA targets.

Authors:  Robert Alazard; Lionel Mourey; Christine Ebel; Peter V Konarev; Maxim V Petoukhov; Dmitri I Svergun; Monique Erard
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 16.971

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.