Literature DB >> 16963221

Interpretation biases in victims and non-victims of interpersonal trauma and their relation to symptom development.

Lisa S Elwood1, Nathan L Williams, Bunmi O Olatunji, Jeffrey M Lohr.   

Abstract

Previous studies examining information processing in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have focused on attention and memory biases, with few studies examining interpretive biases. The majority of these studies have employed lexically based methodologies, rather than examining the processing of visual information. In the present study, victims (N=40) and non-victims (N=41) of interpersonal trauma viewed a series of short positive, neutral, and threatening filmstrips of social situations with ambiguous endings. Participants were then asked about their perceptions and interpretations of the situations. Victims perceived threatening situations as more predictable and more quickly increasing in risk than non-victims. Trauma status interacted with the perceived predictability of positive situations and the perceived speed with which neutral situations reached their conclusion to predict anxious symptoms. In addition, trauma status interacted with the perceived increase in risk of positive situations to predict PTSD symptoms. The implications of these findings for theories of PTSD are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16963221     DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anxiety Disord        ISSN: 0887-6185


  7 in total

Review 1.  A consideration of select pre-trauma factors as key vulnerabilities in PTSD.

Authors:  Jessica Bomyea; Victoria Risbrough; Ariel J Lang
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-07-20

2.  Development of the Interpretation Bias Index for PTSD.

Authors:  Joseph W Boffa; Aaron M Norr; Jamie L Tock; Nader Amir; Norman B Schmidt
Journal:  Cognit Ther Res       Date:  2018-04-23

3.  Differentiating between appraisal process and product in cognitive theories of posttraumatic stress.

Authors:  John T Nanney; Joseph I Constans; Timothy A Kimbrell; Teresa L Kramer; Jeffrey M Pyne
Journal:  Psychol Trauma       Date:  2014-12-22

4.  Distorted maternal mental representations and atypical behavior in a clinical sample of violence-exposed mothers and their toddlers.

Authors:  Daniel S Schechter; Susan W Coates; Tammy Kaminer; Tammy Coots; Charles H Zeanah; Mark Davies; Irvin S Schonfeld; Randall D Marshall; Michael R Liebowitz; Kimberly A Trabka; Jaime E McCaw; Michael M Myers
Journal:  J Trauma Dissociation       Date:  2008

5.  Risk recognition, attachment anxiety, self-efficacy, and state dissociation predict revictimization.

Authors:  Estelle Bockers; Stefan Roepke; Lars Michael; Babette Renneberg; Christine Knaevelsrud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  A Systematic Review of Experimental Paradigms for Exploring Biased Interpretation of Ambiguous Information with Emotional and Neutral Associations.

Authors:  Daniel E Schoth; Christina Liossi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-09

7.  Appraisal-based cognitive bias modification in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Rianne A de Kleine; Marcella L Woud; Hannah Ferentzi; Gert-Jan Hendriks; Theo G Broekman; Eni S Becker; Agnes Van Minnen
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2019-07-08
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.