Literature DB >> 16963195

Psychosocial factors associated with the adherence to a colorectal cancer screening program.

Margalida Gili1, Miquel Roca, Victoria Ferrer, Antoni Obrador, Elena Cabeza.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers and a major cause of cancer related mortality, very little is known about why screening adherence rates are low. First-degree relatives of CRC patients are the largest group of individuals at increased risk of CRC. Psychosocial factors related to CRC screening adherence were examined in a sample of siblings of individuals diagnosed with CRC.
METHOD: To identify psychosocial factors related with participation in cancer screening examinations, 90 siblings of CRC patients were recruited. Adherence to screening by fecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy was the relevant factor. Sociodemographic variables, health locus of control (HLOC), perceived social support, knowledge about CRC and coping strategies were independent measures.
RESULTS: Significant differences were found in age, gender, retirement status, knowledge of sibling's illness, HLOC-powerful others, coping strategies (positive thinking, blaming others, seeking social support), perceived social support types (listening, affective, material) and social support sources (friends, work colleagues and health staff). Using stepwise logistic regression, the strongest predictor of adherence was knowledge of sibling's illness.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that effective strategies to increase participation in CRC screening may include efforts to improve knowledge of sibling's illness, material social support and advice from health staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16963195     DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2006.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev        ISSN: 0361-090X


  12 in total

1.  Can mosapride citrate reduce the volume of lavage solution for colonoscopy preparation?

Authors:  Masahiro Tajika; Yasumasa Niwa; Vikram Bhatia; Shinya Kondo; Tsutomu Tanaka; Nobumasa Mizuno; Kazuo Hara; Susumu Hijioka; Hiroshi Imaoka; Koji Komori; Kenji Yamao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Low-volume plus ascorbic acid vs high-volume plus simethicone bowel preparation before colonoscopy.

Authors:  Stefano Pontone; Rita Angelini; Monica Standoli; Gregorio Patrizi; Franco Culasso; Paolo Pontone; Adriano Redler
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Shared decision-making about colorectal cancer screening: a conceptual framework to guide research.

Authors:  Shannon M Christy; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-02-15

4.  Influence of psychological characteristics and social relations on receiving preventive home visits in older men and women.

Authors:  Kirsten Avlund; Mikkel Vass; Rikke Lund; Yukari Yamada; Carsten Hendriksen
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2008-08-19

5.  Women's perceived control of their birth outcomes in the Central Pennsylvania Women's Health Study: implications for the use of preconception care.

Authors:  Carol S Weisman; Marianne M Hillemeier; Gary A Chase; Dawn P Misra; Cynthia H Chuang; Roxanne Parrott; Anne-Marie Dyer
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2007-10-22

6.  Interactions among physicians, patients, and first-degree relatives in the familial screening of colorectal cancer in France.

Authors:  Isabelle Ingrand; Sarah Dujoncquoy; Virginie Migeot; Véronique Ghadi; Michel Beauchant; Pierre Ingrand
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 2.711

Review 7.  Understanding the contribution of family history to colorectal cancer risk and its clinical implications: A state-of-the-science review.

Authors:  Jan T Lowery; Dennis J Ahnen; Paul C Schroy; Heather Hampel; Nancy Baxter; C Richard Boland; Randall W Burt; Lynn Butterly; Megan Doerr; Mary Doroshenk; W Gregory Feero; Nora Henrikson; Uri Ladabaum; David Lieberman; Elizabeth G McFarland; Susan K Peterson; Martha Raymond; N Jewel Samadder; Sapna Syngal; Thomas K Weber; Ann G Zauber; Robert Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Capsule colonoscopy increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Stefan Groth; Horst Krause; Rainer Behrendt; Helge Hill; Michael Börner; Murat Bastürk; Nora Plathner; Friedrich Schütte; Ulrich Gauger; Jürgen Ferdinand Riemann; Lutz Altenhofen; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Knowledge and attitudes of primary healthcare patients regarding population-based screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Maria Ramos; Maria Llagostera; Magdalena Esteva; Elena Cabeza; Xavier Cantero; Manel Segarra; Maria Martín-Rabadán; Guillem Artigues; Maties Torrent; Joana Maria Taltavull; Joana Maria Vanrell; Mercè Marzo; Joan Llobera
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Effect of public knowledge, attitudes, and behavior on willingness to undergo colorectal cancer screening using the health belief model.

Authors:  Majid A Almadi; Mahmoud H Mosli; Mohamed S Bohlega; Mohanned A Al Essa; Mohammed S AlDohan; Turki A Alabdallatif; Turki Y AlSagri; Faleh A Algahtani; Ahmed Mandil
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.