Literature DB >> 16962747

How can information extraction ease formalizing treatment processes in clinical practice guidelines? A method and its evaluation.

Katharina Kaiser1, Cem Akkaya, Silvia Miksch.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Formalizing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for a subsequent computer-supported processing is a challenging, but burdensome and time-consuming task. Existing methods and tools to support this task demand detailed medical knowledge, knowledge about the formal representations, and a manual modeling. Furthermore, formalized guideline documents mostly fall far short in terms of readability and understandability for the human domain modeler. METHODS AND MATERIAL: We propose a new multi-step approach using information extraction methods to support the human modeler by both automating parts of the modeling process and making the modeling process traceable and comprehensible. This paper addresses the first steps to obtain a representation containing processes which is independent of the final guideline representation language.
RESULTS: We have developed and evaluated several heuristics without the need to apply natural language understanding and implemented them in a framework to apply them to several guidelines from the medical subject of otolaryngology. Findings in the evaluation indicate that using semi-automatic, step-wise information extraction methods are a valuable instrument to formalize CPGs.
CONCLUSION: Our evaluation shows that a heuristic-based approach can achieve good results, especially for guidelines with a major portion of semi-structured text. It can be applied to guidelines irrespective to the final guideline representation format.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16962747      PMCID: PMC2858817          DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2006.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Intell Med        ISSN: 0933-3657            Impact factor:   5.326


  7 in total

1.  Metaphors of movement: a visualization and user interface for time-oriented, skeletal plans.

Authors:  R Kosara; S Miksch
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.326

2.  GEM: a proposal for a more comprehensive guideline document model using XML.

Authors:  R N Shiffman; B T Karras; A Agrawal; R Chen; L Marenco; S Nath
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  The syntax and semantics of the PROforma guideline modeling language.

Authors:  David R Sutton; John Fox
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-06-04       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support.

Authors:  Paul A de Clercq; Johannes A Blom; Hendrikus H M Korsten; Arie Hasman
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.326

5.  EON: a component-based approach to automation of protocol-directed therapy.

Authors:  M A Musen; S W Tu; A K Das; Y Shahar
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Mark-up based analysis of narrative guidelines with the Stepper tool.

Authors:  Marek Růzicka; Vojtech Svátek
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

7.  Comparing computer-interpretable guideline models: a case-study approach.

Authors:  Mor Peleg; Samson Tu; Jonathan Bury; Paolo Ciccarese; John Fox; Robert A Greenes; Richard Hall; Peter D Johnson; Neill Jones; Anand Kumar; Silvia Miksch; Silvana Quaglini; Andreas Seyfang; Edward H Shortliffe; Mario Stefanelli
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

  7 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  GEM at 10: a decade's experience with the Guideline Elements Model.

Authors:  Negin Hajizadeh; Nitu Kashyap; George Michel; Richard N Shiffman
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

Review 2.  Computerization of workflows, guidelines, and care pathways: a review of implementation challenges for process-oriented health information systems.

Authors:  Phil Gooch; Abdul Roudsari
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Standards for scalable clinical decision support: need, current and emerging standards, gaps, and proposal for progress.

Authors:  Kensaku Kawamoto; Guilherme Del Fiol; David F Lobach; Robert A Jenders
Journal:  Open Med Inform J       Date:  2010-12-14

4.  Extracting and transforming clinical guidelines into pathway models for different hospital information systems.

Authors:  Britta Böckmann; Katja Heiden
Journal:  Health Inf Sci Syst       Date:  2013-11-04

5.  Graphical representation of quality indicators based on medical service ontology.

Authors:  Osamu Takaki; Izumi Takeuti; Koichi Takahashi; Noriaki Izumi; Koichiro Murata; Mitsuru Ikeda; Koiti Hasida
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-06-23

6.  Leveraging workflow control patterns in the domain of clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Katharina Kaiser; Mar Marcos
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Versioning computer-interpretable guidelines: semi-automatic modeling of 'Living Guidelines' using an information extraction method.

Authors:  Katharina Kaiser; Silvia Miksch
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 5.326

8.  Free and open source enabling technologies for patient-centric, guideline-based clinical decision support: a survey.

Authors:  T Y Leong; K Kaiser; S Miksch
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2007
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.