Literature DB >> 16962530

A comparative study of hysteroscopic sterilization performed in-office versus a hospital operating room.

Mark Nichols1, James F Carter, Donald L Fylstra, Meredith Childers.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To compare hysteroscopic female sterilization procedures performed in-office versus a hospital operating room (OR) among newly trained physicians.
DESIGN: Multisite hospital operating rooms and physician offices. PATIENTS: Women desiring permanent hysteroscopic sterilization. INTERVENTION: Hysteroscopic female sterilization with the Essure system.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Procedure time (scope in/scope out time), device placement rates, and incidence of complications and adverse events were compared. There was no significant difference in scope time between the 2 settings. There was no significant difference in placement rates, although the placement rate was somewhat higher in-office (91% vs 88%). There were no complications among any of the procedures, and the incidence of minor adverse events was extremely low in both settings (OR=2%, in-office=1%).
CONCLUSION: There is no clear advantage to performing hysteroscopic sterilization in a hospital OR. Hysteroscopic sterilization can be performed safely and efficiently in an office setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16962530     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol        ISSN: 1553-4650            Impact factor:   4.137


  8 in total

1.  Tubal risk markers for failure to place transcervical sterilization coils.

Authors:  Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Mahta Rouhani; Mahbubur Rahman; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 2.  A Meta-Analysis of Bilateral Essure® Procedural Placement Success Rates on First Attempt.

Authors:  Gabriel Frietze; Ophra Leyser-Whalen; Mahbubur Rahman; Mahta Rouhani; Abbey B Berenson
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2015-12-01

Review 3.  Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors:  K McMartin
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2013-10-01

4.  Efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the Essure™ procedure.

Authors:  Collette R Lessard; Matthew R Hopkins
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.711

5.  Comparing options for women seeking permanent contraception in high-resource countries: a protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Gormley; Brian Vickers; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-26

6.  Preprocedure patient preferences and attitudes toward permanent contraceptive options.

Authors:  Hector O Chapa; Gonzalo Venegas
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  The effect of obesity on intraoperative complication rates with hysteroscopic compared to laparoscopic sterilization: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Rachel Shepherd; Christina A Raker; Gina M Savella; Nan Du; Kristen A Matteson; Rebecca H Allen
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2016-02-23

8.  Comparing options for females seeking permanent contraception in high resource countries: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Gormley; Brian Vickers; Brooke Cheng; Wendy V Norman
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.223

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.