Literature DB >> 16962268

Representation of acoustic signals in the human cochlea in presence of a cochlear implant electrode.

Jan Kiefer1, Frank Böhnke, Oliver Adunka, Wolfgang Arnold.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In subjects with remaining low frequency hearing, combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) of the auditory system is a new therapeutic perspective. Intracochlear introduction of a cochlear implant electrode, however, may alter the biomechanical properties of the inner ear and thus affect perception of acoustic stimuli. STUDY
DESIGN: Based on histological observations of morphologic changes after cochlear implantation in cadaveric and post mortem studies the effects of basilar membrane (BM) stiffening in the ascending basal and middle turns of the cochlea due to close contact of the BM with the electrode were simulated in a 3D-computational finite element model of the inner ear. To verify our simulated results, pre- and postoperative pure-tone audiograms of 13 subjects with substantial residual hearing, who underwent cochlear implantation, were evaluated.
RESULTS: In the scenario of partial BM-fixation, acoustic energy of middle (2 kHz) and high (6 kHz) frequency was focused basally and apically to the fixed section, increasing BM displacement amplitudes up to 6 dB at a stimulation level of 94 dB (SPL). Lower frequencies were not affected by fixation in the basal and middle turn of the cochlea. In implanted subjects, a small but significant decrease of thresholds was observed at 1.5 kHz, a place in tonotopy adjacent to the tip region of the implanted electrode.
CONCLUSION: Our model suggests that stiffening of the basilar membrane adjacent to an implanted electrode into the basal and middle cochlear turn did not affect BM movement in the low frequency area. Focussing of acoustic energy may increase perception in regions adjacent to the fixed section. Observations in implanted subjects were concordant with our model predictions. High frequencies, however, should not be amplified in patients using EAS to avoid disturbances in discrimination due to tonotopically incorrect frequency representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16962268     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  14 in total

1.  Relationships between Intrascalar Tissue, Neuron Survival, and Cochlear Implant Function.

Authors:  Donald L Swiderski; Deborah J Colesa; Aaron P Hughes; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-07-20

2.  [Present state of cochlear implant treatment in adults and children].

Authors:  J Maurer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Response Changes During Insertion of a Cochlear Implant Using Extracochlear Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Christopher K Giardina; Tatyana E Khan; Stephen H Pulver; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  A Preliminary Investigation of the Air-Bone Gap: Changes in Intracochlear Sound Pressure With Air- and Bone-conducted Stimuli After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Renee M Banakis Hartl; Jameson K Mattingly; Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Stephen P Cass; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Cochlear Implant Electrode Effect on Sound Energy Transfer Within the Cochlea During Acoustic Stimulation.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Jameson K Mattingly; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin; James R Easter; Stephen P Cass
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Round window electrocochleography before and after cochlear implant electrode insertion.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Christopher K Giardina; Eric J Formeister; Baishakhi Choudhury; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  A three-dimensional finite element model of round window membrane vibration before and after stapedotomy surgery.

Authors:  Monika Kwacz; Piotr Marek; Paweł Borkowski; Maciej Mrówka
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2013-03-05

8.  Three-dimensional histological specimen preparation for accurate imaging and spatial reconstruction of the middle and inner ear.

Authors:  Thomas S Rau; Waldemar Würfel; Thomas Lenarz; Omid Majdani
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Delayed loss of hearing after hearing preservation cochlear implantation: Human temporal bone pathology and implications for etiology.

Authors:  Alicia M Quesnel; Hideko Heidi Nakajima; John J Rosowski; Marlan R Hansen; Bruce J Gantz; Joseph B Nadol
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Achievement of hearing preservation in the presence of an electrode covering the residual hearing region.

Authors:  Shin-Ichi Usami; Hideaki Moteki; Nobuyoshi Suzuki; Hisakuni Fukuoka; Maiko Miyagawa; Shin-Ya Nishio; Yutaka Takumi; Satoshi Iwasaki; Claude Jolly
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 1.494

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.