Literature DB >> 16961949

Working memory deficits in multiple sclerosis: comparison between the n-back task and the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test.

Brett A Parmenter1, Janet L Shucard, Ralph H B Benedict, David W Shucard.   

Abstract

Working memory (WM) deficits are common in multiple sclerosis (MS). The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) is used frequently to measure WM in clinical settings. The n-back paradigm is used often in experimental studies of WM. One unique component of the n-back task is that it provides a measure of reaction time (RT), an additional behavioral index of processing speed and task difficulty. Despite the use of both tasks to measure WM, their common variance has not been documented. We tested 32 MS patients and 20 controls; performance measures were obtained for both tasks. Compared with controls, MS patients generally had poorer performance on both the PASAT and n-back task. MS patients also had slower RTs on the n-back than controls and showed more slowing than controls as a function of WM load. Correlational analyses showed a high correspondence between performance measures on the PASAT and n-back. Principal components analysis pointed to a common feature of the PASAT, n-back, and specific other neuropsychological measures, that is, processing speed. Although the PASAT and n-back were shown to have a significant amount of shared variance, each test has specific advantages and disadvantages for use in clinical populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16961949     DOI: 10.1017/S1355617706060826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc        ISSN: 1355-6177            Impact factor:   2.892


  21 in total

1.  How the speed of working memory updating influences the on-line thematic processing of simple sentences in Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Xiao-Qing Li; Yuan-Yuan Zheng; Hai-Yan Zhao; Jin-Yan Xia
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Updating positive and negative stimuli in working memory in depression.

Authors:  Sara M Levens; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2010-11

3.  The relationship between processing speed and working memory demand in systemic lupus erythematosus: evidence from a visual n-back task.

Authors:  Janet L Shucard; Wing H Lee; Ashley S Safford; David W Shucard
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Object working memory performance depends on microstructure of the frontal-occipital fasciculus.

Authors:  Megan Walsh; Caroline A Montojo; Yi-Shin Sheu; Steven A Marchette; Daniel M Harrison; Scott D Newsome; Feng Zhou; Amy L Shelton; Susan M Courtney
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2011

5.  Deconstructing spatial working memory and attention deficits in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Leon Gmeindl; Susan M Courtney
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Robust perfusion deficits in cognitively impaired patients with secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  P L Francis; R Jakubovic; P O'Connor; L Zhang; A Eilaghi; L Lee; T J Carroll; J Mouannes-Srour; A Feinstein; R I Aviv
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Visual search as a tool for a quick and reliable assessment of cognitive functions in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Kathrin S Utz; Thomas M A Hankeln; Lena Jung; Alexandra Lämmer; Anne Waschbisch; De-Hyung Lee; Ralf A Linker; Thomas Schenk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Is the n-back task a valid neuropsychological measure for assessing working memory?

Authors:  K M Miller; C C Price; M S Okun; H Montijo; D Bowers
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.813

9.  Processing speed versus working memory: contributions to an information-processing task in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Helen M Genova; Jeannie Lengenfelder; Nancy D Chiaravalloti; Nancy B Moore; John DeLuca
Journal:  Appl Neuropsychol Adult       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.248

Review 10.  Neuropsychological impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  R H B Benedict; J L Shucard; R Zivadinov; D W Shucard
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 7.444

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.