Literature DB >> 16961691

Gastro-oesophageal reflux of liquids and gas during transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations.

A J Bredenoord1, B L A M Weusten, R Timmer, A J P M Smout.   

Abstract

Some transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLOSRs) are accompanied by gastro-oesophageal reflux and others are not. We aimed to investigate what factors determine the occurrence and type of reflux during TLOSRs. In 12 healthy subjects prolonged high-resolution manometry was performed. Reflux was detected using pH-impedance monitoring. A total of 219 TLOSRs were detected; no differences were observed between the duration of TLOSRs with liquid-containing reflux (20.2 +/- 1.0 s), gas reflux (17.0 +/- 1.0 s) and no reflux (19.0 +/- 1.0 s). Trans-sphincteric pressure gradient was similar in TLOSRs with liquid reflux (1.6 +/- 0.1 kPa), gas reflux (1.5 +/- 0.1 kPa) and no reflux (1.7 +/- 0.3 kPa). Prevalence, duration and amplitude of oesophageal pre-contractions and sphincteric after-contractions were not different for TLOSRs with and without reflux. The total number of TLOSRs decreased significantly from 8.2 +/- 0.8 in the first to 5.7 +/- 0.5 in the second and 4.4 +/- 0.6 in the third 70-min recording period. The number of TLOSRs accompanied by liquid-containing reflux decreased from 4.7 +/- 0.9 to 3.0 +/- 0.4 to 1.6 +/- 0.4, while the numbers of TLOSRs with gas reflux remained unchanged (2.1 +/- 0.6-2.1 +/- 0.7-2.2 +/- 0.6). Besides, time after the meal, no differences were observed in the characteristics of TLOSRs with and without gastro-oesophageal reflux. We conclude that factors, other than TLOSR characteristics, are important of whether or not a TLOSR is reflux-related.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16961691     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2006.00817.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  7 in total

1.  Oral nitrate reductase activity and erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease: a nitrate hypothesis for GERD pathogenesis.

Authors:  Siavosh Nasseri-Moghaddam; Habibeh Nokhbeh-Zaeem; Parastoo Saniee; Shahrzad Pedramnia; Masoud Sotoudeh; Reza Malekzadeh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Esophageal testing: What we have so far.

Authors:  Nicola de Bortoli; Irene Martinucci; Lorenzo Bertani; Salvatore Russo; Riccardo Franchi; Manuele Furnari; Salvatore Tolone; Giorgia Bodini; Valeria Bolognesi; Massimo Bellini; Vincenzo Savarino; Santino Marchi; Edoardo Vincenzo Savarino
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2016-02-15

Review 3.  Esophageal motility abnormalities in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Irene Martinucci; Nicola de Bortoli; Maria Giacchino; Giorgia Bodini; Elisa Marabotto; Santino Marchi; Vincenzo Savarino; Edoardo Savarino
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-05-06

Review 4.  Nonerosive reflux disease: a pathophysiologic perspective.

Authors:  John D Long; Roy C Orlando
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2008-06

5.  Effect of transoral incisionless fundoplication on reflux mechanisms.

Authors:  Nicolaas F Rinsma; Fabiënne G Smeets; Daisy W Bruls; Boudewijn F Kessing; Nicole D Bouvy; Ad A M Masclee; José M Conchillo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Liquid in the gastroesophageal segment promotes reflux, but compliance does not: a mathematical modeling study.

Authors:  Sudip K Ghosh; Peter J Kahrilas; James G Brasseur
Journal:  Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 4.052

7.  Specific movement of esophagus during transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Hoon Il Kim; Su Jin Hong; Jae Pil Han; Jung Yeon Seo; Kyoung Hwa Hwang; Hyo Jin Maeng; Tae Hee Lee; Joon Seong Lee
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 4.924

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.