Literature DB >> 16960681

Does experience preclude leaks in laparoscopic gastric bypass?

R Gonzalez1, K Haines, S F Gallagher, M M Murr.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improved outcomes of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) have been demonstrated once pratice has moved beyond the learning curve. However, there is no evidence that experience has a favorable impact on the incidence of leaks. This study evaluated the incidence of staple-line leaks as experience accrued in a university-based bariatric surgery program.
METHODS: Prospectively collected data on our first 200 patients undergoing LRYGB since July 1998 were analyzed. Linear staplers were used to divide the stomach and to create a side-to-side jejunojejunostomy. A side-to-side cardiojejunostomy was created using a 21-mm circular stapler. Patient characteristics, operative data, and outcomes were evaluated chronologically with comparison of outcomes between quartiles.
RESULTS: Staple-line leaks developed in 9 (4.5%) of the first 200 patients undergoing LRYGB. Among the 200 patients were 190 women (95%). The median age of the patients was 48 years (ranges, 24-62 years), and their body mass index was 43 kg/m(2) (ranges, 32-59 kg/m(2)). As surgeons' experience increased over time, there was a significant increase in the weight of patients and the percentage of patients with previous abdominal operations. There also was a significant decrease in conversion rates and operative times. Leaks occurred in six patients at the cardiojejunostomy (3%), in two patients jejunojejunostomy (1%), and in one patient at the excluded stomach (0.5%). Of the 50 leaks that occurred in each quartile, there were in the 3 in the 1st quartile, 1 in the 2nd quartile, 2 in the 3rd quartile, 3 in the 4th quartile. The differences were not significant. There was no correlation between the number of LRYGBs, and the occurrence of a leak (p = 0.59 confidence interval -0.13-0.22).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of staple-line leaks appears to be independent of the number of LRYGBs performed. These data suggest that surgeons' experience may not eliminate anastomotic complications experienced by patients undergoing LRYGB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16960681     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8253-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  18 in total

1.  The learning curve for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is 100 cases.

Authors:  P Schauer; S Ikramuddin; G Hamad; W Gourash
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Technical considerations for transabdominal loading of the circular stapler in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Michel M Murr; Scott F Gallagher
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Who should be doing laparoscopic bariatric surgery?

Authors:  Osama Al-Saif; Scott F Gallagher; Magdalena Banasiak; Sherene Shalhub; David Shapiro; Michel M Murr
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Acquiring surgical skills: a comparative study of open versus laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Kesavapillai Subramonian; Suren DeSylva; Peter Bishai; Peter Thompson; Gordon Muir
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.

Authors:  P R Schauer; S Ikramuddin; W Gourash; R Ramanathan; J Luketich
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Gastric bypass operation for obesity.

Authors:  M A Fobi; H Lee; R Holness; D Cabinda
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  The effect of practice on performance in a laparoscopic simulator.

Authors:  A M Derossis; J Bothwell; H H Sigman; G M Fried
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Mechanisms of gastric and esophageal perforations during laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.

Authors:  P R Schauer; W C Meyers; S Eubanks; R F Norem; M Franklin; T N Pappas
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Results of 281 consecutive total laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypasses to treat morbid obesity.

Authors:  Eric J DeMaria; Harvey J Sugerman; John M Kellum; Jill G Meador; Luke G Wolfe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Roux-en-Y gastric bypass leak complications.

Authors:  J Stephen Marshall; Anil Srivastava; Samir K Gupta; Thomas R Rossi; James R DeBord
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-05
View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Staple line reinforcement in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: does it actually make a difference? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  George A Giannopoulos; Nikolaos E Tzanakis; George E Rallis; Stamatis P Efstathiou; Christos Tsigris; Nikolaos I Nikiteas
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Repeated Duodenal Stump Perforation Using a Stapling Device Following Subtotal Gastrectomy With Roux-en-Y Reconstruction for Advanced Gastric Cancer: Lessons From a Rare Case.

Authors:  Tadashi Furihata; Makoto Furihata; Naoki Satoh; Masato Kosaka; Kunibumi Ishikawa; Keiichi Kubota
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-04

3.  Lowering gastrointestinal leak rates: a comparative analysis of robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  Brad E Snyder; Todd Wilson; Terry Scarborough; Sherman Yu; Erik B Wilson
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2008-09-02

4.  Single-layer versus double-layer laparoscopic intracorporeally sutured gastrointestinal anastomoses in the canine model.

Authors:  Azine Tavakoli; Jalal Bakhtiari; Ali Reza Khalaj; Mohammad Javad Gharagozlou; Abbas Veshkini
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Role of intraoperative esophagogastroenteroscopy in minimizing gastrojejunostomy-related morbidity: experience with 2,311 laparoscopic gastric bypasses with linear stapler anastomosis.

Authors:  Ashraf Haddad; Nicholas Tapazoglou; Kuldeep Singh; Andrew Averbach
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.129

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.