Literature DB >> 16960231

Age differences in implicit interference.

Simay Ikier1, Lynn Hasher.   

Abstract

We assessed age differences in interference effects in priming by using fragment completion. In Experiment 1, noninterfering filler words preceded critical targets at study, and priming was age invariant. In Experiment 2, the same target items had interfering competitors at the beginning of the list, such that both the target and the competitor were legitimate solutions to a fragment. Having two responses to a cue was disruptive for older adults, but not for younger adults. Younger and older adults differ in their susceptibility to interference in implicit tasks, and interference may play a role in influencing the magnitude of age differences in priming.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16960231      PMCID: PMC1751475          DOI: 10.1093/geronb/61.5.p278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci        ISSN: 1079-5014            Impact factor:   4.077


  27 in total

1.  Age differences in behavior and PET activation reveal differences in interference resolution in verbal working memory.

Authors:  J Jonides; C Marshuetz; E E Smith; P A Reuter-Lorenz; R A Koeppe; A Hartley
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The role of interference in memory span.

Authors:  C P May; L Hasher; M J Kane
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-09

Review 3.  Implicit memory is not immune to interference.

Authors:  C Lustig; L Hasher
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Dissociable neural mechanisms underlying response-based and familiarity-based conflict in working memory.

Authors:  James K Nelson; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Ching-Yune C Sylvester; John Jonides; Edward E Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mental models and the fan effect.

Authors:  G A Radvansky; R T Zacks
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Fact retrieval in younger and older adults: the role of mental models.

Authors:  G A Radvansky; R T Zacks; L Hasher
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1996-06

Review 7.  The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition.

Authors:  T A Salthouse
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 8.934

8.  Dissociation of memory and awareness in young and older adults.

Authors:  L L Light; A Singh; J L Capps
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.475

9.  Guessing strategies, aging, and bias effects in perceptual identification.

Authors:  L L Light; R F Kennison
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1996-12

10.  Aging, sexual dimorphism, and hemispheric asymmetry of the cerebral cortex: replicability of regional differences in volume.

Authors:  Naftali Raz; Faith Gunning-Dixon; Denise Head; Karen M Rodrigue; Adrienne Williamson; James D Acker
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.673

View more
  4 in total

1.  When age is irrelevant: distractor inhibition and target activation in priming of pop-out.

Authors:  Marta Wnuczko; Jay Pratt; Lynn Hasher; Rob Walker
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-11-14       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Effect of repetition lag on priming of unfamiliar visual objects in young and older adults.

Authors:  Leamarie T Gordon; Anja Soldan; Ayanna K Thomas; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-12-31

3.  Inhibitory Selection Mechanisms in Clinically Healthy Older and Younger Adults.

Authors:  Teal S Eich; Beatriz M M Gonçalves; Derek E Nee; Qolamreza Razlighi; John Jonides; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Selective attention affects conceptual object priming and recognition: a study with young and older adults.

Authors:  Soledad Ballesteros; Julia Mayas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.