Literature DB >> 16956796

Gaps and forks in DNA replication: Rediscovering old models.

Alan R Lehmann1, Robert P Fuchs.   

Abstract

Most current models for replication past damaged lesions envisage that translesion synthesis occurs at the replication fork. However older models suggested that gaps were left opposite lesions to allow the replication fork to proceed, and these gaps were subsequently sealed behind the replication fork. Two recent articles lend support to the idea that bypass of the damage occurs behind the fork. In the first paper, electron micrographs of DNA replicated in UV-irradiated yeast cells show regions of single-stranded DNA both at the replication forks and behind the fork, the latter being consistent with the presence of gaps in the daughter-strands opposite lesions. The second paper describes an in vitro DNA replication system reconstituted from purified bacterial proteins. Repriming of synthesis downstream from a blocked fork occurred not only on the lagging strand as expected, but also on the leading strand, demonstrating that contrary to widely accepted beliefs, leading strand synthesis does not need to be continuous.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16956796     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2006.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  81 in total

Review 1.  Coordination of DNA-PK activation and nuclease processing of DNA termini in NHEJ.

Authors:  Katherine S Pawelczak; Sara M Bennett; John J Turchi
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 8.401

2.  The MMS22L-TONSL complex mediates recovery from replication stress and homologous recombination.

Authors:  Lara O'Donnell; Stephanie Panier; Jan Wildenhain; Johnny M Tkach; Abdallah Al-Hakim; Marie-Claude Landry; Cristina Escribano-Diaz; Rachel K Szilard; Jordan T F Young; Meagan Munro; Marella D Canny; Nadine K Kolas; Wei Zhang; Shane M Harding; Jarkko Ylanko; Megan Mendez; Michael Mullin; Thomas Sun; Bianca Habermann; Alessandro Datti; Robert G Bristow; Anne-Claude Gingras; Michael D Tyers; Grant W Brown; Daniel Durocher
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Activation of new replication foci under conditions of replication stress.

Authors:  P Rybak; A Waligórska; Ł Bujnowicz; A Hoang; J W Dobrucki
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  Accumulation of DNA damage in the aged hematopoietic stem cell compartment.

Authors:  Isabel Beerman
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.851

5.  A dynamic polymerase exchange with Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV replacing DNA polymerase III on the sliding clamp.

Authors:  Asako Furukohri; Myron F Goodman; Hisaji Maki
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 6.  The fidelity of DNA synthesis by eukaryotic replicative and translesion synthesis polymerases.

Authors:  Scott D McCulloch; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 7.  Eukaryotic translesion polymerases and their roles and regulation in DNA damage tolerance.

Authors:  Lauren S Waters; Brenda K Minesinger; Mary Ellen Wiltrout; Sanjay D'Souza; Rachel V Woodruff; Graham C Walker
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 11.056

8.  A novel variant of DNA polymerase ζ, Rev3ΔC, highlights differential regulation of Pol32 as a subunit of polymerase δ versus ζ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Hollie M Siebler; Artem G Lada; Andrey G Baranovskiy; Tahir H Tahirov; Youri I Pavlov
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-05-10

9.  PCNA-Ub polyubiquitination inhibits cell proliferation and induces cell-cycle checkpoints.

Authors:  Zhoushuai Qin; Zhiqiang Bai; Ying Sun; Xiaohong Niu; Wei Xiao
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Genomic assay reveals tolerance of DNA damage by both translesion DNA synthesis and homology-dependent repair in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Lior Izhar; Omer Ziv; Isadora S Cohen; Nicholas E Geacintov; Zvi Livneh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.