Literature DB >> 16956144

The portfolio: how was it for you? Views of F2 doctors from the Mersey Deanery Foundation Pilot.

I Ryland1, J Brown, M O'Brien, D Graham, R Gillies, T Chapman, N Shaw.   

Abstract

A study was conducted between August 2004 and August 2005 to explore the experiences of Foundation year 2 (F2) trainees who used the learning portfolio on the Mersey Deanery pilot scheme. Seventy-three trainees (77%) reported receiving their portfolio during their induction. In their first four-month placement, 90 trainees (96%) completed the two case-based discussions, 80 (87%) the three mini clinical examinations and 92 (97%) the two direct observation of practical procedures. The number of trainees who felt there was an opportunity to make a record of and analyse clinical critical incidents and critical incidents related to professional behaviour was only 32 (35%) and 13 (15%) respectively. Free text responses suggested that trainees appreciate the portfolio but that an understanding of its content and purpose, particularly by educational supervisors, is paramount to its success.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16956144      PMCID: PMC4953521          DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.6-4-378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  6 in total

1.  Monitoring resident progress through mentored portfolios.

Authors:  Paul Dougherty; Paula T Ross; Monica L Lypson
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-12

Review 2.  Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors' education and performance: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alice Miller; Julian Archer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-09-24

Review 3.  Confounding factors in using upward feedback to assess the quality of medical training: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anli Yue Zhou; Paul Baker
Journal:  J Educ Eval Health Prof       Date:  2014-08-13

4.  Supervised learning events in the foundation programme: a UK-wide narrative interview study.

Authors:  Charlotte E Rees; Jennifer A Cleland; Ashley Dennis; Narcie Kelly; Karen Mattick; Lynn V Monrouxe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Qualitative study of the impact of an authentic electronic portfolio in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  Rosie Belcher; Anna Jones; Laura-Jane Smith; Tim Vincent; Sindhu Bhaarrati Naidu; Julia Montgomery; Inam Haq; Deborah Gill
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 2.463

Review 6.  A Systematic Scoping Review on Portfolios of Medical Educators.

Authors:  Daniel Zhihao Hong; Annabelle Jia Sing Lim; Rei Tan; Yun Ting Ong; Anushka Pisupati; Eleanor Jia Xin Chong; Chrystie Wan Ning Quek; Jia Yin Lim; Jacquelin Jia Qi Ting; Min Chiam; Annelissa Mien Chew Chin; Alexia Sze Inn Lee; Limin Wijaya; Sandy Cook; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2021-03-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.