Literature DB >> 16955812

Applications, complications, and outcomes of transvenous pacemaker implantation in 105 dogs (1997-2002).

Gerhard Wess1, William P Thomas, Denise M Berger, Mark D Kittleson.   

Abstract

We reviewed the indications for age and breeds of dogs who received transvenous endocardial artificial pacemaker (AP) implantation (n = 105) and complications and survival thereafter at a single institution over a 6-year period. A third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block (59%) and sick sinus syndrome (SSS; 27%) were the most common indications, along with a high-grade second-degree AV block (9%) and atrial standstill (5%). The most common breeds identified were Labrador Retriever (n = 16; 11 with a third-degree AV block), American Cocker Spaniel (n = 14; 10 with SSS), and Miniature Schnauzer (n = 13; all with SSS). Common presenting complaints were syncope (n = 66) and exercise intolerance or lethargy (n = 25). Half of the dogs (n = 52) had a history of acute onset of clinical signs (<2 weeks). Mean survival time for the 60 dogs who died during the study period was 2.2 years (range, 0.1-5.8 years). Major complications occurred in 13% of dogs and included lead displacement (n = 7), sensing problems that led to syncope (n = 3), infection at the pacemaker site (n = 1), bleeding (n = 1), and ventricular fibrillation during implantation (n = 1; successfully defibrillated). Minor complications occurred in 11 dogs (11%). The success rate of transvenous AP implantation was comparatively high (all dogs survived the first 48 hours), and the complication rate was comparatively low when compared with a previous multicenter study, most likely because of how commonly the procedure was performed and supervisory experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16955812     DOI: 10.1892/0891-6640(2006)20[877:acaoot]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Intern Med        ISSN: 0891-6640            Impact factor:   3.333


  10 in total

1.  Sick sinus syndrome in a dog: treatment with dual-chambered pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Heather Burrage
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Survival of 4 dogs with persistent atrial standstill treated by pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Justin D Thomason; Marc S Kraus; Tiffany L Fallaw; Clay A Calvert
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.008

3.  Biopsy of an intracardiac paraganglioma in a dog using a fluoroscopically guided endovascular technique.

Authors:  Joseph S Raleigh; William T N Culp; Rachel Brady; Sami Al-Nadaf; Michael S Kent; Joanna L Kaplan; Joshua A Stern; Lance C Visser; Kevin D Niedringhaus; Tatiana G Wolf; Eunju Choi; Verena K Affolter
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 3.333

4.  Complication rates associated with transvenous pacemaker implantation in dogs with high-grade atrioventricular block performed during versus after normal business hours.

Authors:  J L Ward; T C DeFrancesco; S P Tou; C E Atkins; E H Griffith; B W Keene
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.333

5.  Long term effects of cilostazol in a dog with sick sinus syndrome.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kanno; Tomohiro Suzuki
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 1.267

6.  Retrospective Analysis of Indications and Complications Related to Implantation of Permanent Pacemaker: 25 Years of Experience in 31 Dogs.

Authors:  Agnieszka Noszczyk-Nowak; Marcin Michałek; Karolina Kapturska; Adrian Janiszewski; Robert Pasławski; Piotr Skrzypczak; Urszula Pasławska
Journal:  J Vet Res       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 1.744

7.  2022 Update of the Consensus on the Rational Use of Antithrombotics and Thrombolytics in Veterinary Critical Care (CURATIVE) Domain 1- Defining populations at risk.

Authors:  Armelle deLaforcade; Lenore Bacek; Marie-Claude Blais; Corrin Boyd; Benjamin M Brainard; Daniel L Chan; Stefano Cortellini; Robert Goggs; Guillaume L Hoareau; Amy Koenigshof; Ron Li; Alex Lynch; Alan Ralph; Elizabeth Rozanski; Claire R Sharp
Journal:  J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio)       Date:  2022-05-02

8.  A retrospective review of 146 active and passive fixation bradycardia lead implantations in 74 dogs undergoing pacemaker implantation in a research setting of short term duration.

Authors:  Lynne E Swanson; Barbara A Huibregtse; Brian A Scansen
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 2.741

Review 9.  Indications for permanent pacing in dogs and cats.

Authors:  R A Santilli; F Giacomazzi; D M Porteiro Vázquez; M Perego
Journal:  J Vet Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 1.701

10.  Single-Chamber Cardiac Pacemaker Implantation in a Donkey with Complete AV Block: A Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Markéta Sedlinská; Radovan Kabeš; Miroslav Novák; Filip Kološ; Pavlína Melková
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 2.752

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.