Literature DB >> 10515014

Impact of the type of brace on the quality of life of Adolescents with Spine Deformities.

J M Climent1, J Sánchez.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A group of 102 brace-treated adolescents, aged 10-19 years with spine deformities participated in a cross-sectional study.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of various types of orthoses on self-perceived health status. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal orthosis is an effective means of controlling progressive scoliosis, but bracing has shown a considerable impact on several aspects of adolescent functioning.
METHODS: Skeletally immature patients with spine deformities (75% with idiopathic scoliosis) who visited consecutively for routine biannual follow-up evaluations of orthotic treatment were studied. Twenty-five patients used the Milwaukee brace, 30 the Boston brace, 13 the thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO), and 34 the Charleston bending orthosis. Patients completed the Quality of Life Profile for Spine Deformities (QLPSD), a specific instrument that measures quality of life in five areas labeled psychosocial functioning, sleep disturbances, back pain, body image, and back flexibility. Higher QLPSD scores mean a high level of impairment of quality of life.
RESULTS: Milwaukee brace-treated patients scored significantly higher than Boston brace-treated and TLSO-braced patients and patients with Charleston bending orthosis in the overall QLPSD score (mean +/- SD, 53.60 +/- 13.26 vs. 45.65 +/- 12.81 and 42.79 +/- 12.99, respectively) and in back flexibility and psychosocial functioning. Other quality-of-life-related variables selected in multivariate analysis were the Risser sign, clinical diagnosis, duration of brace treatment, and degrees of correction.
CONCLUSION: In cases of different orthoses of proven similar effectiveness in controlling the scoliotic curves, the use of bracing with the lowest impact on the quality of life should be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10515014     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199909150-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  41 in total

1.  When Should We Wean Bracing for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis?

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Keith Dip-Kei Luk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after brace treatment and surgery assessed by means of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument 24.

Authors:  Karen Petra Weigert; Linda Marie Nygaard; Finn Bjarke Christensen; Ebbe Stender Hansen; Cody Bünger
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-25       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  [Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis : Guideline for practical application].

Authors:  J Seifert; F Thielemann; P Bernstein
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  No effect of osteopathic treatment on trunk morphology and spine flexibility in young women with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Carol Hasler; Caius Schmid; Andreas Enggist; Conny Neuhaus; Thomas Erb
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 1.548

5.  Comparative multifactorial analysis of the effects of idiopathic adolescent scoliosis and Scheuermann kyphosis on the self-perceived health status of adolescents treated with brace.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Spyridon Zacharatos; Georgios Koureas; Panagiotis Megas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-09-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Evaluation of quality of life and risk factors affecting quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jing Han; Qintong Xu; Yi Yang; Zhengjun Yao; Chi Zhang
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2015-02

7.  Curve Progression in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Does Not Match Skeletal Growth.

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Prudence Wing Hang Cheung; Dino Samartzis; Keith Dip-Kei Luk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  German validation of the quality of life profile for spinal disorders (QLPSD).

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Meinald T Thielsch; Georg Gosheger; Patrick Boertz; Jan Henrik Terheyden; Mark Wetterkamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  A history of bracing for idiopathic scoliosis in North America.

Authors:  Reginald S Fayssoux; Robert H Cho; Martin J Herman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  A prospective randomized controlled study on the treatment outcome of SpineCor brace versus rigid brace for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with follow-up according to the SRS standardized criteria.

Authors:  Jing Guo; Tsz Ping Lam; Man Sang Wong; Bobby Kin Wah Ng; Kwong Man Lee; King Lok Liu; Lik Hang Hung; Ajax Hong Yin Lau; Sai Wing Sin; Wing Kwan Kwok; Fiona Wai Ping Yu; Yong Qiu; Jack Chun Yiu Cheng
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-12-31       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.